Traditional access reviews assume access persists long enough to be observed, certified, and removed on a schedule. Agentic systems can be created dynamically, act continuously, and complete work before a review cycle ever sees a stable entitlement. The result is a governance gap between review cadence and execution speed.
Related resources from NHI Mgmt Group
- When does just-in-time access reduce risk for agentic AI, and when does it fall short?
- How does the rise of AI identities impact traditional IAM systems?
- How should security teams limit the risk from AI agents that have access to production systems?
- How should security teams govern AI agents that can access enterprise systems?