By NHI Mgmt Group Editorial TeamBased on Leostream: “What’s in store for Privileged Access, Identity Management, and IT Security” (December 16, 2025)

TL;DR: Passwordless will enter privileged environments in 2026, AI-assisted session oversight will expand, and browser-based access will accelerate as hybrid work, compliance pressure, and compromised credentials reshape IAM and PAM priorities, according to Leostream. The bigger issue is that access governance is moving from static policy enforcement toward contextual, continuous control across human, machine, and third-party identities.


At a glance

What this is: This is a 2026 IAM and PAM predictions piece from Leostream arguing that passwordless, AI-assisted session oversight, browser-based access, and hybrid identity pressure will reshape privileged access governance.

Why it matters: It matters because IAM and PAM teams now have to govern human, vendor, and machine access under the same hybrid operating model, where static controls are losing relevance.

By the numbers:

  • The IAM and PAM category is projected to grow to nearly 12 billion US dollars by 2030, according to Leostream.

Context

Leostream's 2026 predictions sit at the intersection of IAM, PAM, and hybrid access governance. The article argues that passwordless adoption, AI-assisted session control, browser-based access, and rising breach pressure will change how organisations govern privileged access across employees, vendors, and non-human identities.

The underlying problem is not a single control gap. It is the widening mismatch between static access models and environments where users, devices, and machine identities move across cloud, on-premises, and third-party boundaries in the same operational flow.


Key questions

Q: What breaks when privileged access still depends on long-lived secrets?

A: Long-lived secrets create standing privilege, which means compromise windows stay open long enough for attackers to harvest, reuse, and spread access. They also make lifecycle governance weaker because revocation becomes manual and delayed. In cloud-native environments, that breaks the assumption that access can be safely left in place between tasks.

Q: Why do on-premises privileged access weaknesses still create cloud security risk in hybrid environments?

A: Because the identity chain is only as strong as its weakest authentication and authorization layer. If on-prem Active Directory, federation, or legacy admin paths remain broad and poorly segmented, attackers can pivot from those footholds into cloud resources. Hybrid identity makes privilege boundaries harder to defend, so weak on-prem controls continue to amplify cloud exposure.

Q: How do security teams know whether privileged session controls are actually working?

A: They should test whether high-risk admin sessions are phishing-resistant, bound to known devices, and short-lived enough to prevent reuse after compromise. The strongest signal is that suspicious session activity produces revocation before bulk administrative actions occur. If destructive actions still succeed after unusual login behavior, the control is not containing blast radius.

Q: What should organisations do when vendors and machine identities share the same access surface?

A: They should govern them as separate trust subjects even when they use the same platform. Vendors need tight onboarding, expiry, and offboarding controls, while machine identities need inventory, scope review, and recovery handling that matches their operational role. Treating all non-human access the same leaves gaps in ownership and revocation.


Technical breakdown

Passwordless in privileged environments

Passwordless access in privileged environments replaces reusable secrets with authenticators such as passkeys, hardware keys, and biometrics. In practice, that shifts risk from password theft and vault exposure toward device trust, recovery design, and step-up policy. For PAM, the important change is that authentication becomes more contextual, because the system must validate the user, the device, and the session conditions at the point of access rather than relying on a static credential.

Practical implication: align privileged access flows with adaptive authentication and device posture checks before removing password-based fallback paths.

AI-assisted session security and continuous oversight

AI-assisted session security moves monitoring beyond alerting on known patterns. The article describes machine-learning baselines, anomaly detection, session termination, masking, and step-up authentication as the core mechanisms. That matters because privileged session oversight becomes continuous rather than periodic, with generative AI helping summarise risky behaviour and surface lateral movement indicators while the session is still active.

Practical implication: treat session analysis as a live control surface, not a post-event review step.

Browser-based access and clientless privilege control

Browser-based privileged access removes the need for thick clients or VPN dependence by placing control in a hardened browser layer. Credential injection, clipboard control, and keystroke isolation reduce exposure on the endpoint while simplifying third-party onboarding. The architectural trade-off is that governance moves into the browser session itself, so the security team must trust and instrument the access layer very carefully.

Practical implication: review whether browser-based access can replace agent-heavy workflows without weakening session-level controls or auditability.


Threat narrative

Attacker objective: The objective is to turn legitimate privileged access into broad operational reach before defenders can detect or contain the activity.

  1. Entry begins when a compromised privileged credential, contractor account, or supplier access path is used to enter the environment through a trusted administrative workflow.
  2. Escalation follows when the attacker reuses that access across hybrid systems, moving from one privileged session to another and extending reach through over-trusted administrative pathways.
  3. Impact occurs when the attacker reaches sensitive data, critical infrastructure, or cloud control planes through the same privileged access chain that normal operations depend on.
  • Uber breach 2022: A contractor's stolen password and MFA fatigue gave a Lapsus$-linked attacker Uber's internal tools; Uber rotated keys to many services.
  • BeyondTrust breach 2024: A stolen BeyondTrust Remote Support API key let a China state-sponsored actor reset accounts and reach US Treasury workstations in 2024.

Read and download The State of NHI & AI Agent Breach Report 2026, covering 200+ breaches impacting Non-Human Identities including AI Agents.


NHI Mgmt Group analysis

Hybrid access is now an identity governance problem, not just an infrastructure problem. Leostream's predictions describe a world where users, vendors, and machine identities all traverse the same operational paths. That means governance can no longer be organised around one access model for staff and another for everything else. The practitioner conclusion is that privilege policy has to follow the access path, not the employment status of the identity subject.

Passwordless is becoming a privileged access pattern, not just an authentication preference. In high-risk environments, the real change is that reusable secrets stop being the centre of gravity and authentication posture becomes tied to device trust and session context. That does not remove governance requirements, but it does change where control starts. Practitioners should expect privileged access programmes to move closer to continuous verification models.

AI-assisted oversight is the first step toward autonomous access governance, but that shift should be treated cautiously. The article points to generative AI summarising risky session activity and triggering controls in real time. That expands what PAM tools can do, yet it also raises a deeper question about who or what is making the decision to terminate, mask, or challenge access. The implication is that governance boundaries are starting to move from human review to machine-enforced intervention.

Browser-based privileged access is a control-plane redesign, not a convenience feature. By pulling access into hardened browser sessions, organisations change where credential injection, clipboard control, and keystroke isolation happen. That can reduce endpoint exposure, but it also concentrates trust in the access layer itself. Practitioners should read this as a shift in control placement, with auditability and session instrumentation becoming more important than the client form factor.

Privilege abuse is now a board-level resilience issue because compromised access remains the shortest path to catastrophic loss. The article's breach framing is consistent with the broader market signal: administrative access is where hybrid complexity, vendor trust, and ransomware pressure intersect. That makes lifecycle governance, auditability, and external-party access control central to resilience planning, not secondary compliance work.

From our research library:

What this signals

Hybrid access is becoming the default governance unit. IAM teams should expect the boundary between workforce IAM, PAM, and NHI governance to keep collapsing as vendors, service accounts, and administrators use the same access paths. A programme built around separate exceptions will struggle to keep pace with that operating model.

Adaptive authentication is now a privileged access requirement, not an add-on. When privileged sessions depend on device posture, step-up decisions, and live risk scoring, identity controls must move closer to the point of use. That shift is consistent with 69% of security leaders agree identity management must fundamentally shift to address agentic AI systems, according to the 2026 Infrastructure Identity Survey.


For practitioners

  • Map privileged workflows across human, vendor, and machine identities Inventory where privileged access crosses employee, contractor, service account, and API boundaries, then identify which paths still rely on static assumptions about who is behind the session.
  • Replace password-only privilege with adaptive authentication Move high-risk access paths toward passkeys, hardware keys, or biometric verification, and tie step-up rules to device posture and session risk instead of password reuse.
  • Instrument privileged sessions for live anomaly handling Use session monitoring that can detect lateral movement indicators, trigger masking, and terminate access before the session completes when behaviour diverges from the baseline.
  • Separate browser-based access trust from endpoint trust If browser-based access is adopted, validate credential injection, clipboard control, and keystroke isolation as part of the access layer rather than assuming the endpoint is the only protection boundary.
  • Review third-party access offboarding and recovery paths Check whether vendor and contractor access can be revoked cleanly, including any emergency or support workflows that bypass normal lifecycle controls.

Key takeaways

  • Leostream's outlook shows that IAM and PAM are converging around hybrid access, where human, vendor, and machine identities follow the same control path.
  • The operational pressure is coming from passwordless adoption, AI-assisted session oversight, browser-based access, and persistent breach risk around privileged credentials.
  • Teams that still separate workforce, vendor, and non-human access governance will struggle to control privilege consistently across hybrid environments.

Standards & Framework Alignment

This section maps relevant standards and security frameworks to the operational risks and controls described in this guidance.

OWASP Non-Human Identity Top 10 and MITRE ATT&CK address the attack and risk surface, while NIST CSF 2.0 sets the governance and control requirements practitioners need to meet.

FrameworkControl / ReferenceRelevance
OWASP Non-Human Identity Top 10NHI-04 — Insecure AuthenticationPasswordless adoption and adaptive authentication directly address privileged authentication risk.
NHI-05 — Overprivileged NHIThe article's hybrid access model includes vendors and machine identities with privileged reach.
NHI-07 — Long-Lived SecretsThe article explicitly links credential sprawl and password reuse to privileged access risk.
Recommendation — Use passwordless and step-up controls to reduce reusable credential exposure in privileged workflows. Review non-human access paths for excessive privilege and remove standing scope wherever possible. Shorten credential lifetimes and replace long-lived privileged secrets with stronger authentication patterns.
NIST CSF 2.0PR.AA-05 — Access Permissions, Entitlements and AuthorizationsHybrid access control depends on correctly governing entitlements across users, vendors, and machines.
Recommendation — Enforce entitlement review and authorization logic across all privileged access paths.
MITRE ATT&CKTA0006;TA0008 — Credential Access; Lateral MovementThe article's threat framing centres on credential compromise and movement through privileged sessions.
Recommendation — Map privileged access abuse to credential access and lateral movement detections in your monitoring stack.

Key terms

  • Adaptive Authentication: Adaptive authentication changes the strength of login checks based on context such as device, location, source network, and session history. It helps IAM teams respond to suspicious access without forcing every user through the same high-friction path.
  • Browser-Based Privileged Access: Browser-based privileged access delivers high-risk access through a hardened browser session instead of a local client or VPN. The model reduces endpoint dependence and can simplify third-party onboarding, but it shifts control requirements to isolation, revocation, and strict session enforcement inside the browser boundary.
  • AI-Assisted Session Security: The use of machine analysis to monitor privileged sessions, detect risky patterns, and trigger controls while access is active. It combines behavioural baselining, alerting, masking, and termination actions, making oversight more continuous than traditional log review.
  • Hybrid Access Control: A combined approach where RBAC sets the broad entitlement boundary and ABAC narrows access based on context. In practice, this is often the most workable pattern for dynamic enterprises because it preserves auditability while still supporting time-, device-, location-, or purpose-aware decisions.

Deepen your knowledge

NHI governance, agentic AI identity, and machine identity lifecycle are core topics in our NHI Foundation Level course, the industry's only accredited NHI security programme. If you are building or maturing an IAM programme, it is worth exploring.
NHIMG Editorial Note
Published by the NHIMG editorial team on July 8, 2026.
Updated on October 11, 2026.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org