The Ultimate Guide to Non-Human Identities Report
NHI Forum

Notifications
Clear all

The Challenges of Identity Governance in Complex Active Directory (AD) Environments


(@clarity-security)
Trusted Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 24
Topic starter  

Read full article here: https://claritysecurity.com/clarity-blog/identity-governance-challenges-in-complex-active-directory-environments/?source=nhimg

 

For many enterprises, Active Directory (AD) has grown into a tangled web of domains, nested groups, and hybrid on-premises/cloud  deployments. Mergers, acquisitions, and organic growth have created multi-domain environments that are almost impossible to “clean up” without massive cost and disruption. Security best practices may advise against nested groups or multiple domains, but the reality is simple: organizations must govern AD as it exists today, not as the textbooks suggest.

 

The Core Challenges

  1. Hybrid Complexity
    • Synchronization issues between on-prem AD and Azure Entra ID.
    • Different capabilities across platforms make unified policy enforcement difficult.
    • Inconsistent access policies across hybrid setups.

  2. Nested Groups
    • Useful for administration but lead to opaque permissions.
    • Hard to troubleshoot or audit access paths.
    • Limited Azure Entra support, especially in app roles and licensing.

  3. Multi-Domain Environments
    • Complex cross-domain identity management.
    • Difficulty applying consistent governance.
    • Consolidation of identity data for reviews is resource-heavy.

  4. RBAC Gaps
    • Azure Entra ID doesn’t allow AD groups in Entra Roles.
    • Hybrid models break role-based consistency.

  5. Foreign Security Principals (FSPs)
    • Enable cross-domain access but introduce audit and management complexity.
    • Difficult to review, prone to misconfiguration, and increase risk.

 

Why This Matters: The Access Review Conundrum

In these environments, access reviews become one of the most painful governance activities:

  • Manual processes are slow and error-prone.
  • Native tools don’t handle nested groups or multi-domain visibility.
  • Flattening and linking groups requires advanced coding (and endless debugging).
  • Without transparency, access risk remains hidden until auditors or attackers expose it.

 

The Options Facing Organizations

  • Manual Governance – Costly and slow, but “safe.”
  • Ignoring the Problem – Easy in the short term, but risks failed audits, compliance fines, and security breaches.
  • Unaware Exposure – Dangerous blind spots if organizations don’t realize what they’ve inherited.
  • Investing in Purpose-Built Solutions – The only scalable way to align governance with business reality.

 

How Clarity Security Helps

Clarity takes a realistic approach: instead of forcing migrations or costly restructuring, it provides native support for hybrid multi-domain AD environments, including foreign security principals and nested groups. With Clarity, organizations can:

  • Discover over-assigned privileges (e.g., excessive domain admin rights).
  • Reduce months of manual data prep into automated workflows.
  • Streamline and simplify the entire access review lifecycle.

The result - identity governance that fits complex AD environments instead of fighting against them.

 


   
Quote
Share: