Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Break-Glass and Emergency Access Account Guide
Guide Privileged Access (PAM)

Break-Glass and Emergency Access Account Guide

← All guides
By Lalit Choda, NHI Mgmt Group Updated 26 September 2026 4 min read
On this page

When the identity provider is down, MFA is broken or administrators are locked out, someone still needs to get in. Break-glass (emergency access) accounts provide that route. They are also some of the most dangerous accounts an organisation owns: highly privileged, often excluded from normal controls and rarely used, which means misuse can go unnoticed. This guide explains how to design, protect, test and monitor break-glass access for cloud directories, on-premises systems, PAM and critical applications.

Key takeaways

  • Keep a small number of break-glass accounts (commonly two per critical platform), independent of the systems they are meant to recover.
  • Protect them with phishing-resistant, independent authentication, such as FIDO2 security keys held in secure physical storage, not the same MFA path that might fail.
  • Alert on every use. Break-glass sign-ins should wake someone up.
  • Test regularly and after changes. An emergency account that does not work in an emergency is worse than useless.

When break-glass is needed

  • Identity provider or federation outage.
  • MFA service outage or misconfiguration locking out administrators.
  • Conditional access policy error blocking all admins.
  • Loss of the only administrators (departure, incident, account compromise).
  • PAM platform outage preventing credential retrieval.
  • Cyber incident where normal admin accounts may be compromised.

Designing break-glass accounts

  • Independence: cloud-only accounts that do not depend on on-premises federation or synchronisation; local accounts for critical on-premises systems.
  • Minimal number: usually two per platform, so one can be used while the other is protected.
  • Clear naming that does not advertise purpose to attackers scanning directories, while being documented internally.
  • Exclusion design: exclude from conditional access policies that could lock them out, but still require strong authentication; review exclusions carefully.
  • No day-to-day use: never used for routine administration, email or browsing.

Protecting credentials

  • Use FIDO2 security keys or certificate-based authentication for each account, stored in separate secure physical locations (for example, safes at two sites).
  • If passwords are also used, make them long and random, split between custodians (dual control) and stored securely offline.
  • Do not store break-glass credentials only in the PAM platform or password manager that might itself be unavailable.
  • Record custody: who holds what, and when it was last checked.

Monitoring

  • Alert immediately on any sign-in, attempted sign-in or change to break-glass accounts, to several people through channels independent of the identity platform.
  • Alert on changes to exclusions, authentication methods or role assignments for these accounts.
  • Investigate every use, even tests, and record the reason.

Testing

  • Test each account on a schedule (for example, quarterly) and after major identity platform or policy changes.
  • Verify authentication works, the account retains required roles and alerts fire.
  • Rotate secrets after each use or test where appropriate.

After use

  1. Record who used it, when, why and what was done.
  2. Review all actions taken during the session.
  3. Rotate credentials and re-secure physical tokens.
  4. Fix the root cause that required emergency access.

Break-glass beyond the directory

  • PAM platforms: an emergency procedure for retrieving vaulted credentials if the vault is unavailable. See the PAM Buyer's Guide.
  • Cloud root and organisation accounts: secure the root user or equivalent with hardware MFA and alerting.
  • Critical applications: emergency admin access for payment, ERP and operational technology systems.
  • Automation: do not give AI agents or scripts access to break-glass credentials.

Common failure patterns

  • Break-glass accounts that depend on the same federation or MFA service they are meant to bypass.
  • Emergency accounts used for routine work because it is convenient.
  • No alerting, so misuse goes unnoticed.
  • Accounts never tested, discovered not to work during an outage.
  • Credentials held by one person who has left.

Practitioner checklist

  • Define break-glass accounts for each critical platform, independent of the systems they recover.
  • Protect them with phishing-resistant authentication and secure, split physical custody.
  • Exclude them from lockout-prone policies deliberately and document why.
  • Alert on every use and change through independent channels.
  • Test on a schedule and after changes; rotate after use.
  • Review every use and fix root causes.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Privileged Access Management Guide · Active Directory and Entra ID Hardening Guide · IdP and SSO Security Guide · JIT Access Guide

Explore further

Sign up to our weekly newsletter — get 33% off our NHI Foundation Level Course

    NHIMG Editorial Note
    Written and reviewed by Lalit Choda, NHI Mgmt Group. Last updated 26 September 2026.
    NHI Mgmt Group — the #1 independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org