Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Android Private Space: what it hides and what…
Guide Application Security

Android Private Space: what it hides and what IT should control

PDF for newsletter subscribers · free to read online

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 28 October 2026 14 min read
On this page

Android Private Space gives users a locked, hideable second profile for sensitive apps, and the same features that protect a user's privacy can hide apps, data and network traffic from the people responsible for the device. Private Space arrived in Android 15 as a separate user profile with its own optional lock, its own accounts and its own app copies. This guide explains how it works at the platform level, what it does and does not protect, how it interacts with work profiles and the Android Management API, and what security teams should decide for company-owned, BYOD and kiosk fleets. It is written for mobile and endpoint engineers, MDM administrators and app developers whose apps handle work data or detect profiles.

Key takeaways

  • It is a real profile, not an app vault. Private Space uses a separate user profile of type android.os.usertype.profile.PRIVATE; when locked, the profile is stopped and its apps cannot run, notify or sync.
  • Admins control it only on company-owned work profile devices. Android 15 lets administrators block and remove Private Space on the personal side of a corporate-owned device (DISALLOW_ADD_PRIVATE_PROFILE, or privateSpacePolicy in the Android Management API); it is not available at all on fully managed devices.
  • Private Space apps bypass the device VPN. Google's help centre says so plainly, which matters wherever a VPN or secure web gateway is part of the control set for the personal side of a device.
  • Hidden does not mean undetectable. Google lists app installers, ADB or computer access, apps that detect Private Space and device logs as ways the space can still be found, so treat it as a privacy feature, not an anti-forensics or isolation boundary.
  • Work-profile logic in apps can break. Google warns that apps must not assume that a copy of the app outside the main profile is the work profile, a mistake that can mislabel personal data as managed or the reverse.

How Private Space works

Android's developer documentation describes Private Space as a way for users to "keep sensitive apps away from prying eyes, under an additional layer of authentication". The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) documentation describes the mechanics: it is a profile built on the multi-user model, there can be only one per device, and it can exist only for the main user. It can coexist with a work profile and a clone profile.

  • Lock state: "When the space is locked, the private profile user is stopped, and when the space is unlocked, the user is started." A stopped profile runs no foreground or background work and shows no notifications.
  • Authentication: the user chooses the device screen lock or a separate PIN, pattern or password. Auto-lock options include every time the device locks, five minutes after screen timeout, or only after restart.
  • Separate copies: apps are installed fresh into the space through whichever store the user prefers, and existing apps and their data cannot be moved in. Accounts are separate: the space does not read accounts from the main space.
  • Visibility: while locked, the space's apps are hidden from the launcher, recents, notifications, Settings, sharing and search. With "Hide private space when it's locked", even the launcher entry point disappears.
  • Crossing the boundary: the system sharesheet and photo picker can pass content between spaces only while the space is unlocked. Android 16 QPR2 adds an "Add files" shortcut that copies or moves files into the space's Downloads folder.
  • Intents: telephony intents go to the main user; other intents stay inside the private profile.

What it protects and what it does not

ScenarioDoes Private Space help?Why
Someone borrows an unlocked phone and browses appsYesLocked and hidden apps are absent from launcher, recents and search, and need the separate lock
Notification shoulder surfingYesA stopped profile cannot post notifications
Separating a personal account from synced main-space dataOnly with a dedicated accountGoogle warns that reusing an account signed in elsewhere can expose synced photos, mail, contacts, browsing history and saved passwords outside the space
Malware running in the main spacePartlyA locked profile is stopped and its data is separate, but an unlocked space is a running user, and kernel or system compromise is outside the profile model
Forensic examination or a determined device ownerNoGoogle says the space can still be detected through installs, ADB, detection apps and device logs
Data loss if the lock is forgottenRisk, not protectionThe space cannot be backed up with device backup; deleting or resetting it loses on-device data permanently

For most users the honest description is a strong privacy screen with real process isolation when locked. It is not a security container in the sense of a managed work profile: the organisation has no policy channel into it, and it is not designed to resist someone with physical or debugging access.

Private Space in each Android Enterprise mode

Android's "What's new in enterprise" page for Android 15 sets out the management rules. The table maps them to the management modes covered in the Android Enterprise Security Guide.

ModePrivate Space available?Admin controlsPractical position
Fully managed (company-owned, no personal side)NoNot needed: "Private space is not available on fully managed devices"Nothing to do beyond confirming the mode
Company-owned with work profile (COPE)Yes, on the personal sideUserManager.DISALLOW_ADD_PRIVATE_PROFILE blocks creation and removes an existing space; Android Management API privateSpacePolicy (Android 15 and later, added December 2024); personal app allowlists and blocklists also apply inside the space under the Android Management APIDecide explicitly: allow, or disallow with a stated reason in the acceptable use policy
Personally owned with work profile (BYOD)Yes, under the user's controlNone documented for the personal sideTreat as part of the unmanaged personal profile; protect work data at the work profile boundary
Dedicated device (kiosk)Not applicableFully managed mode appliesConfirm kiosk devices are provisioned as fully managed
Unmanaged device with app protection onlyYesNone at device levelApp-level controls (managed app configuration, conditional access) must carry the load
  • Custom DPCs: the Android 15 enterprise page says personal app allowlists inside the space were available for the Android Management API, with custom DPC support "in the future". Check your EMM before relying on blocklists.
  • Removal is destructive: applying the restriction to a device that already has a space removes it. Because Private Space data is not included in device backup, warn users before enforcement or they may lose personal data the organisation has no right to delete without notice.
  • Work profile cannot live inside it: Google's help centre states that a work profile cannot be set up from Private Space, so the space cannot be used to run a second, shadow work profile.

The enterprise risks worth acting on

  • VPN and gateway bypass: Private Space apps bypass the device VPN. If your COPE design relies on an always-on VPN or a personal-side web filter for acceptable use, data loss prevention or threat protection, that control does not cover the space.
  • Shadow app stores and sideloaded apps: the space's "Install apps" entry launches any app store that declares CATEGORY_APP_MARKET, and the user picks the store. A user who wants an unvetted store or sideloaded APK has a convenient hiding place. See the Mobile Malware Guide.
  • Hidden copies of work-capable apps: a user can install a second copy of a collaboration or file-sharing app in the space and sign in with a personal account. Work data that reaches the personal side through copy and paste or sharing can then be moved somewhere invisible to casual review.
  • Mobile threat defence blind spot: an MTD agent in the work profile or main space sees only its own profile. Confirm with your vendor what, if anything, it can observe about a private profile; do not assume coverage.
  • Insider and investigation implications: on corporate devices, a hidden space may hold evidence relevant to an investigation, yet it can be deleted with one authentication. See the Mobile Forensics Guide.
  • Critical apps going silent: Google warns that the space is unsuitable for apps that must notify, such as medical apps. The same applies to authenticator or on-call alerting apps: an MFA push app installed in a locked space will not receive prompts.

Where identity fits

Private Space is an identity boundary as much as an app boundary. It has its own Google account (or none), its own sign-ins and its own authenticator state. Three identity issues follow. First, tokens and sessions for corporate SaaS created inside the space are invisible to device management even though they authenticate as the user; conditional access that requires a compliant managed device is what prevents work sign-ins from an unmanaged profile. Second, an authenticator or passkey provider installed only inside a locked space is unavailable when the space is locked, which produces help desk MFA resets, a known social engineering path. Third, any app that stores API keys or OAuth refresh tokens on the device stores a separate set in each copy, so revocation after a device loss must cover both. See the OAuth for Native and Mobile Apps Guide and the Okta Security Hardening Guide for help desk reset controls.

Guidance for app developers

  • Do not infer the work profile: Android 15 behaviour changes warn that apps "shouldn't assume that any installed copies of their app that aren't in the main profile are in the work profile". Identify a managed profile through the device policy and managed configuration APIs, not by counting profiles.
  • Do not try to detect and refuse: Google notes apps "can't determine whether or not they're being used in the private space". Medical and safety apps should tell users not to install them there.
  • Launchers: must hold ROLE_HOME and declare ACCESS_HIDDEN_PROFILES, keep a separate container, support lock and unlock through requestQuietModeEnabled(), hide the space from search while locked, and react to ACTION_PROFILE_AVAILABLE and ACTION_PROFILE_UNAVAILABLE.
  • App stores: declare CATEGORY_APP_MARKET to receive the space's install intent.
  • Background work: scheduled jobs, alarms and push handling stop when the space locks. Design server-side retries and do not treat missed heartbeats from a private copy as device loss.

The Android App Security Guide and Kotlin and Android Secure Coding Guide cover the wider app-side controls.

Deciding and rolling out a Private Space policy

Decision guidance

SituationRecommended stanceTrade-off
COPE devices with generous personal useAllow, document in policy, rely on work profile controlsPersonal side traffic in the space escapes any personal-side VPN
COPE devices in regulated roles (trading, healthcare, government)Disallow with privateSpacePolicy or DISALLOW_ADD_PRIVATE_PROFILEUsers lose a privacy feature; explain why
Devices issued to people at high risk of targetingUsually disallow, and prefer fully managed modeReduces places for malicious apps to hide; see the Mobile Communications Protection for High-Risk Individuals Guide
BYODNo device control; enforce conditional access and app protectionThe organisation must not try to see personal profiles
Small organisation without an EMMAccept the feature; require managed apps and compliant device for work sign-ins where the identity provider supports itLess visibility, lower cost

Rollout steps

  1. Inventory: list devices by management mode and Android version. Only Android 15 and later devices are affected.
  2. Decide per device group: agree allow or disallow with HR, legal and the data protection officer, and update the acceptable use and BYOD Policy Template wording.
  3. Notify users first: where you will disallow, give users time to move data out, because enforcement removes an existing space and its data is not backed up.
  4. Pilot: apply the policy to an IT ring of COPE devices, confirm creation is blocked and an existing test space is removed, and check the EMM reports the policy as compliant.
  5. Test the VPN gap: on an allowed device, create a space, install a browser, and confirm what your network controls see. Record the result in the risk register.
  6. Roll out by ring: widen in stages, watching help desk tickets for lost authenticator apps and data.
  7. Roll back: setting the policy back to allowed lets users create a space again; removed spaces and their data cannot be restored, which is why notice comes first.

Detection and measurement

Organisations cannot and should not inspect the contents of a user's Private Space. Measurement is about policy state and outcomes.

  • Policy coverage: share of Android 15+ COPE devices with the intended privateSpacePolicy applied and reported compliant.
  • Mode correctness: share of kiosk and high-risk devices actually enrolled as fully managed.
  • Conditional access enforcement: share of work sign-ins from Android that come from a compliant managed profile; unmanaged sign-ins trend down.
  • MFA reset tickets citing a "hidden" or locked authenticator: should stay near zero after user guidance.
  • App test coverage: for in-house apps with work profile logic, share tested on Android 15 with a private profile present.

Common failure patterns

  • Assuming the VPN covers the personal side: traffic from Private Space apps does not use the device VPN, so a personal-side filtering control has a silent gap.
  • Enforcing removal without warning: applying the restriction deletes users' spaces and data that cannot be recovered, creating complaints and possible employment disputes.
  • Counting profiles to find the work profile: in-house apps that treat "the other copy" as managed may apply work policies to personal data or leave work data unprotected.
  • Authenticator in the space: MFA prompts never arrive while the space is locked, users call the help desk, and a weak reset process becomes the attack path.
  • Treating hidden as secure: sensitive users told that Private Space protects them against a forensic examiner or spyware are given false assurance.

Framework mapping

FrameworkReferenceRelevance
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5AC-19 Access Control for Mobile Devices; CM-11 User-installed Software; CM-7 Least Functionality; SC-7 Boundary ProtectionMobile configuration, user app installs, VPN-based boundary assumptions
NIST CSF 2.0PR.PS (Platform Security); PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication and Access Control)Device configuration and device-aware access
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex AA.8.1 User endpoint devices; A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems; A.6.7 Remote workingEndpoint and software installation policy
MITRE ATT&CK for MobileT1628 Hide Artifacts (T1628.001 Suppress Application Icon, T1628.002 User Evasion)Malicious apps use hiding behaviours; a hidden profile is another place to look for them
OWASP MASVSMASVS-PLATFORM, MASVS-STORAGECorrect platform interaction and data storage in app copies

Practitioner checklist

  • Record the management mode and Android version of every device; Private Space applies to Android 15 and later.
  • Confirm kiosk and high-risk devices are fully managed, where Private Space is unavailable.
  • Make an explicit allow or disallow decision for company-owned work profile devices and set privateSpacePolicy or DISALLOW_ADD_PRIVATE_PROFILE accordingly.
  • Notify users before disallowing, since removal deletes the space and its data cannot be restored.
  • Document that Private Space apps bypass the device VPN and adjust any personal-side network controls in the risk register.
  • Require a compliant managed profile for work sign-ins through conditional access.
  • Tell users not to install authenticators, alerting or medical apps inside Private Space.
  • Test in-house apps with a private profile present and remove any "other profile equals work profile" logic.
  • Brief legal, HR and investigators on how the feature affects evidence on corporate devices.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Android Enterprise Security Guide · Mobile Device Management Security Guide · Mobile Device Security Guide · BYOD Policy Template

PDF for subscribers

Take this guide with you

Every section, table and checklist in one PDF, with links to the sources and related guides. Subscribe to our weekly NHI & AI Identity Journal and we’ll email you a download link.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 28 October 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org

PDF Downloads for Newsletter Subscribers

Get the guide

Enter your details and we’ll email you a download link.

The full guide is free to read online. The PDF is a thank you for subscribing.

Fill in all fields marked * and tick the PDF box to continue.