Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Cybersecurity Statistics Guide: Sourced Figures on Attacks, Costs…
Guide Threat Intelligence & Threat Actors

Cybersecurity Statistics Guide: Sourced Figures on Attacks, Costs and Defences

PDF for newsletter subscribers · free to read online

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 26 October 2026 13 min read
On this page

Most cybersecurity statistics quoted in board papers and vendor decks cannot be traced back to a primary report, and many that can are years out of date or describe a different population than the reader assumes. This page collects headline figures only from the publishers' own report pages, PDFs and datasets: government statistics bodies, national agencies, law enforcement and the recurring annual industry reports. Every figure is shown with its report name, publisher and as-of year, so you can check it and refresh it when the next edition appears. It is written for security leaders, analysts and anyone who needs a number they can defend, and it links to the NHI Mgmt Group statistics pages that go deeper on each theme. Last reviewed: October 2026.

Key takeaways

  • Exploited vulnerabilities now lead breach entry. The Verizon 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) says 31% of breaches start with software vulnerabilities, overtaking stolen credentials as the top initial access route.
  • Ransomware is common in breaches but less often paid. Ransomware features in 48% of breaches in the 2026 DBIR, while Verizon reports payouts shrinking and many victims declining to pay.
  • Breach costs hit a record. IBM's Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026 puts the global average at USD 4.99 million, up 12% on the previous year.
  • Fraud losses dwarf ransomware losses in complaint data. The FBI IC3 2025 Internet Crime Report records USD 20.877 billion in reported losses, with business email compromise at about USD 3.05 billion and ransomware complaints reporting about USD 32 million.
  • Basics still decide most outcomes. In the UK Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, 43% of businesses had a breach or attack, phishing was the most common type, and only 25% had a formal incident response plan.

Headline statistics

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
31% of breaches start with exploitation of software vulnerabilitiesData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon (incidents 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2025)
48% of breaches involve ransomwareData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon
USD 4.99 million global average cost of a data breach, up 12%Cost of a Data Breach Report 2026, IBM with Ponemon Institute
1,008,597 complaints and USD 20.877 billion in reported lossesInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)
43% of UK businesses (about 612,000) and 28% of charities identified a breach or attack in the previous 12 monthsCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), published 30 April 2026
8,257 incidents analysed; DDoS accounted for 51.3% of recorded incidentsENISA Threat Landscape 2026, European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (calendar year 2025)
204 nationally significant incidents out of 429 handled, up from 89NCSC Annual Review 2025, UK National Cyber Security Centre (1 September 2024 to 31 August 2025)
1,754 vulnerabilities in the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue; 270 added in 2026 to 21 OctoberKnown Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, CISA (catalogue version 2026.10.21)
59% of organisations report critical or significant cybersecurity skills needs, up from 44%2025 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, ISC2 (survey July to August 2025)

Statistics by theme (each with primary source and as-of date)

Breaches and their cost

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
Global average breach cost USD 4.99 million, described by IBM as a record high, driven by higher detection, escalation and lost business costsCost of a Data Breach Report 2026, IBM with Ponemon Institute
Organisations using security AI and automation extensively saved USD 1.93 million compared with those using noneCost of a Data Breach Report 2026, IBM with Ponemon Institute
Breaches involving AI model inversion attacks averaged USD 6 millionCost of a Data Breach Report 2026, IBM with Ponemon Institute
Medium (65%) and large (69%) UK businesses were more likely to identify breaches or attacks than micro (42%) and small (46%) businessesCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT

For breakdowns by industry, record type and region, see the Data Breach Statistics Guide.

Initial access and vulnerability exploitation

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
31% of breaches start with software vulnerabilities, now ahead of stolen credentials as the top initial access methodData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon
Vulnerability exploitation was the vector in 60.4% of unauthorised access incidents where a vector could be identified (only 5.2% of unauthorised access incidents had an identifiable vector)ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
1,754 entries in the KEV catalogue as of 21 October 2026Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, CISA
Entries added per calendar year: 186 in 2024, 245 in 2025, 270 in 2026 to 21 OctoberKnown Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, CISA (catalogue version 2026.10.21)
361 KEV entries are flagged as known to be used in ransomware campaignsKnown Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, CISA (catalogue version 2026.10.21)
Microsoft products account for 390 KEV entries, followed by Cisco (101) and Apple (95)Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, CISA (catalogue version 2026.10.21)

Counts per vendor reflect installed base and disclosure practice as much as product quality. See the Vulnerability and Exploitation Statistics Guide and the Vulnerability Prioritisation Guide.

Ransomware and extortion

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
48% of breaches involve ransomwareData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon
3,611 ransomware complaints with USD 32,320,105 in reported losses; most reported variants Akira, Qilin, INC/Lynx/Sinobi, BianLian and PlayInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Ransomware made up 47.3% of financially motivated incident claimsENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
1% of UK businesses experienced ransomware, down from 3% in each of the two previous surveysCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT

IC3 losses exclude most business interruption and recovery costs and depend on victims reporting, so they understate ransomware's impact. See the Ransomware Statistics Guide and the Ransomware Prevention Guide.

Phishing, social engineering and fraud

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
Phishing was the most common breach or attack type: 38% of businesses and 25% of charitiesCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
Impersonation affected 12% of UK businesses, down from 17% in 2023Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
Phishing accounted for 77.8% of social engineering incidents, followed by malicious spam at 13%ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
191,561 phishing and spoofing complaintsInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Business email compromise: 24,768 complaints, USD 3,046,598,558 in lossesInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Investment fraud: 72,984 complaints, USD 8,648,617,756 in lossesInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Cryptocurrency-related losses: USD 11,366,669,732Internet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Victims aged 60 and over: 201,266 complaints, USD 7.748 billion in lossesInternet Crime Report 2025, FBI IC3
Mobile users show 40% higher click rates, making mobile a favoured phishing targetData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon

See the Phishing Statistics Guide, the Business Email Compromise and Fraud Statistics Guide and the Phishing-Resistant MFA Guide.

AI in attacks and defence

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
15% of attack techniques are bolstered by generative AIData Breach Investigations Report 2026, Verizon
AI-driven attacks up 56%, led by deepfake impersonation and AI-enabled malwareCost of a Data Breach Report 2026, IBM with Ponemon Institute
AI is the most pressing skills need, cited by 41% of respondents; 28% have integrated AI security tools2025 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, ISC2

See the AI Security Statistics Guide and the Deepfake and AI Impersonation Guide.

Threat landscape: who is targeted and why

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
DDoS accounted for 51.3% and unauthorised access for 39.5% of recorded incidentsENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
Ideology-driven (hacktivist) activity made up 57.3% of incidents; financially motivated 29.3%; cyber espionage 5.9% in the executive summaryENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
Most targeted sectors: public administration 31.8%, business services 8.5%, transport 8%, manufacturing 6.9%, finance and banking 5.6%ENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
About 73% of recorded incidents affected entities classed as essentialENISA Threat Landscape 2026, ENISA
429 incidents handled, 204 nationally significant (89 the year before), 18 highly significantNCSC Annual Review 2025, NCSC (year to 31 August 2025)

ENISA's DDoS and hacktivism shares are counts of recorded incidents, most of them low impact, not a measure of harm. See the Hacktivism Guide and the DDoS Protection Guide.

Governance, supply chain and insurance

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
31% of UK businesses (68% of large businesses) and 30% of charities have a board member or trustee responsible for cyber securityCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
25% of businesses and 19% of charities have a formal incident response planCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
15% of businesses reviewed cyber risks from immediate suppliers; 6% reviewed the wider supply chainCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
47% of businesses and 35% of charities have some form of cyber insuranceCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT
19% of businesses (about 267,000) and 14% of charities were victims of at least one cyber crimeCyber Security Breaches Survey 2025/2026, DSIT

See the Supply Chain Attack Statistics Guide, the Cyber Insurance Statistics Guide and the Third-Party Risk Management Guide.

Workforce and skills

FigureReport, publisher, as-of year
95% of respondents report at least one skills need; 59% report critical (23%) or significant (36%) needs, up from 44%2025 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, ISC2 (16,029 respondents)
24% of organisations had security layoffs, 36% budget cuts and 39% hiring freezes2025 Cybersecurity Workforce Study, ISC2

ISC2's 2025 study does not publish a global workforce gap figure, so older gap numbers should not be presented as current. See the Security Workforce and Skills Gap Statistics Guide.

Other themes

Figures for identity attacks, non-human identities and leaked secrets, cloud, insider threat and OT are covered on their own pages, where sources specific to each field are listed: the Identity Attack Statistics Guide, Non-Human Identity and Secrets Statistics Guide, Cloud Security Statistics Guide, Insider Threat Statistics Guide and OT and ICS Security Statistics Guide.

What the numbers mean for defenders

Signal in the dataDefensive priorityMeasure it with
Vulnerability exploitation is the leading initial access route (Verizon DBIR 2026) and KEV additions keep rising (CISA)Patch internet-facing systems against KEV entries first; reduce exposed edge services. See the Vulnerability Management Guide.Median days to remediate KEV-listed vulnerabilities on internet-facing assets
Phishing is the most common attack type (DSIT 2025/2026, ENISA 2026) and BEC losses exceed USD 3 billion (IC3 2025)Phishing-resistant MFA for staff and administrators; out-of-band verification for payment changesPercentage of accounts on phishing-resistant MFA; percentage of payment change requests independently verified
Ransomware in nearly half of breaches (Verizon DBIR 2026)Isolated, tested backups and rehearsed recovery. See the Ransomware Response and Recovery Guide.Time to restore a tier-1 service in the last test
Few organisations have incident response plans (25%) or review suppliers (15%) (DSIT 2025/2026)Written, exercised incident plan; supplier risk tiering. See the Incident Response Guide.Date of last tabletop; percentage of critical suppliers assessed
Security AI and automation linked to USD 1.93 million lower breach costs (IBM 2026)Automate triage and containment where detections are matureMean time to contain, tracked quarterly
  • Use your own data first: Industry averages describe someone else's estate. Use them to frame risk, then show your own exposure: KEV backlog, MFA coverage, restore times.
  • Machine credentials sit behind several of these numbers: Exploited edge devices, stolen tokens and leaked API keys all give attackers non-human access that MFA does not cover. See the Non-Human Identity (NHI) Guide.
  • Small and large organisations read the same data differently: DSIT shows large businesses far more likely to detect attacks, partly because they look harder. A small business with no detected incidents may simply have no detection. Baseline schemes are a sensible floor. See the Cyber Essentials Guide.

Methodology notes and caveats

SourceWhat it measuresMain caveat
Verizon DBIRConfirmed breaches and incidents from Verizon's caseload and contributing partnersContributor mix changes each year, so shifts can reflect who contributed as much as attacker behaviour
IBM Cost of a Data BreachModelled costs from interviews with breached organisations, research by Ponemon InstituteAverages are skewed by a few very costly breaches; compare like with like across editions
FBI IC3 Internet Crime ReportComplaints filed with IC3, mainly from the United StatesSelf-reported; losses are what victims report, and many incidents are never reported
UK Cyber Security Breaches SurveyOfficial statistics from a survey of UK businesses, charities and education institutionsCounts breaches organisations identified; small firms detect less. Since 2025/2026 the edition label is dual-year to match fieldwork timing
ENISA Threat LandscapeIncidents recorded from open sources and information shared with ENISAReporting period changed: the 2025 edition covered July 2024 to June 2025 (4,875 incidents); the 2026 edition covers calendar 2025 (8,257 incidents), so editions are not directly comparable
NCSC Annual ReviewIncidents the NCSC handled, by severity categoryReflects incidents reported to the NCSC, not all UK incidents
CISA KEVVulnerabilities with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wildInclusion requires a clear remediation action; 2021 counts include the catalogue's initial launch load
ISC2 Workforce StudyOnline survey of security professionalsOpinion survey, not a census; 2025 edition reports needs, not a numeric workforce gap
  • Do not mix editions: Quote the year of the report and the period it covers. A "2026" report usually describes the previous year's data.
  • Percentages need their base: ENISA's 60.4% vulnerability exploitation figure is a share of a small subset of incidents with a known vector; quoting it as "60% of attacks" is wrong.
  • Vendor reports are the vendor's figures: Verizon and IBM are industry publishers, not neutral statistics bodies. Attribute their numbers to them.
  • What is excluded here: Figures that appear only in aggregator roundups, or that could not be found on the publisher's own page, report or dataset, were left out.

Practitioner checklist

  • Cite the report name, publisher and year next to every figure you reuse.
  • Check the reporting period, not only the edition year, before comparing two numbers.
  • Prefer government statistics (DSIT, ENISA, NCSC, IC3) for prevalence claims and label industry figures as such.
  • Pair each external statistic in a board paper with an internal metric that shows your own position.
  • Track KEV-listed vulnerabilities in your estate against the catalogue each week.
  • Refresh figures when new editions publish: DBIR in spring, DSIT survey in spring, IBM in summer, ENISA in autumn, NCSC review in October, IC3 in spring.
  • Drop any statistic you cannot trace to its primary source.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Data Breach Statistics Guide · Ransomware Statistics Guide · Non-Human Identity and Secrets Statistics Guide · Identity Attack Statistics Guide

PDF for subscribers

Take this guide with you

Every section, table and checklist in one PDF, with links to the sources and related guides. Subscribe to our weekly NHI & AI Identity Journal and we’ll email you a download link.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 26 October 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org

PDF Downloads for Newsletter Subscribers

Get the guide

Enter your details and we’ll email you a download link.

The full guide is free to read online. The PDF is a thank you for subscribing.

Fill in all fields marked * and tick the PDF box to continue.