Traditional access reviews assume access persists long enough to be observed, certified, and removed on a schedule. Agentic systems can be created dynamically, act continuously, and complete work before a review cycle ever sees a stable entitlement. The result is a governance gap between review cadence and execution speed.
Related resources from NHI Mgmt Group
- When does just-in-time access reduce risk for agentic AI, and when does it fall short?
- How does the rise of AI identities impact traditional IAM systems?
- How should security teams limit the risk from AI agents that have access to production systems?
- How should security teams govern AI agents that can access enterprise systems?
Deepen Your Knowledge
NHIMG Editorial Note
Reviewed and updated by the NHIMG editorial team on June 7, 2026.
NHI Mgmt Group — the #1 independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org
Reviewed and updated by the NHIMG editorial team on June 7, 2026.
NHI Mgmt Group — the #1 independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org
