Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Frontier AI Models Compared: Specs, Prices and Access…
Guide AI Platforms

Frontier AI Models Compared: Specs, Prices and Access for Each Lab’s Flagship

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 15 November 2026 18 min read
On this page

Every major AI lab now ships a flagship model, and the specs, prices, licences and access rules differ so much that a side-by-side view built from the labs' own documentation is the only reliable way to compare them. This page sets out the latest flagship model from twelve providers, including Chinese labs, with the same fields for each: API ID, release date, context window, maximum output, input types, parameters, licence, price and access status. It is written for developers, architects, buyers and anyone tracking the frontier of large language models. Providers are listed alphabetically; order is never a ranking. The page gives facts only, with no verdicts, and where a provider does not publish a fact the table says so.

Last checked: 2026-11-15.

This is an independent reference page from NHI Mgmt Group based on public provider documentation; it is not sponsored or endorsed by any provider. Model details change quickly, so confirm figures against each provider's current documentation, linked in the sources list.

Key takeaways

  • Twelve flagships, twelve sets of rules. The models covered are Qwen3.8-Max (Alibaba), Claude Fable 5.2 (Anthropic), DeepSeek-V4-Pro (DeepSeek), Gemini 4 Carbon (Google), Muse Wonder (Meta), MAI Thinking 1 (Microsoft), MiniMax-M3 (MiniMax), Mistral Large 4 (Mistral AI), Kimi K3.1 Pro (Moonshot AI), GPT-6 Astra (OpenAI), Grok 4.7 (xAI) and GLM-5.3 (Z.ai).
  • A 1M-token context is now common. Ten of the twelve providers state a context window of about one million tokens for their flagship; xAI states 500,000 for Grok 4.7 and Microsoft states 256K for MAI Thinking 1.
  • List prices span more than a tenfold range. Standard input prices on the pages checked run from US$0.30 per million tokens (MiniMax-M3, up to 512K input) to US$10 (GPT-6 Astra), and output prices from US$1.20 to US$50.
  • Six flagships publish weights. Alibaba, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Mistral AI, Moonshot AI and Z.ai publish weights on Hugging Face, each under its own licence; Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI list their flagships as proprietary, and Meta and Microsoft do not state a weights release on the pages checked.
  • Access is not always open. Gemini 4 Carbon on Google Cloud is for verified enterprise customers in select regions, Muse Wonder is in preview on the Meta Model API, MAI Thinking 1's playground is for personal, non-commercial use, and Anthropic's Mythos 5.2 (same capabilities as Fable 5.2) is limited to verified organisations.

How the flagship models were selected

A "frontier" or "flagship" model is the most capable general model a lab offers. To keep the choice objective, this page takes, for each provider, the model that the provider's own documentation describes as its most capable, its flagship or its frontier model, as of 15 November 2026. Where a provider uses different words on different pages, the choice and the wording are stated below.

ProviderFlagship coveredHow the provider describes it
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8-MaxThe Hugging Face card calls Qwen3.8-Max "the official version" of the 2.4T-parameter Qwen3.8 model, with more features than the open weights
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2Recommended for demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, or when Opus 5.5 at higher effort falls short
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813)The official release of DeepSeek-V4-Pro, superseding the preview version
GoogleGemini 4 Carbon"Google's frontier model" on Google Cloud; Google AI Studio calls Gemini 4 Argon its flagship reasoning model
MetaMuse Wonder"Meta's most capable model"
MicrosoftMAI Thinking 1An expert reasoning model for complex problems
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3A native multimodal model with a 1M context
Mistral AIMistral Large 4An open-weight, general-purpose multimodal model
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 Pro"Our most capable 3T-class model to date"
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra"Our most capable model for the most demanding work"
xAIGrok 4.7A frontier model for coding, agentic tasks and knowledge work
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.3"Z.ai's latest flagship model"

Providers not covered here, such as Amazon, Baidu, ByteDance, Cohere and Tencent, have their own model hubs on this site. Each provider's full line-up, including smaller and older models, is on its hub page, for example OpenAI Models, Anthropic Models and Google Gemini Models.

Frontier AI models at a glance

As of 2026-11-15. Source: each provider's model page, model card or release notes, listed in the sources section. "Not stated" means the provider did not publish the fact on the pages checked (2026-11-15).

ProviderModelAPI IDRelease dateContext windowMax outputInput types
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8-Maxqwen3.8-maxAugust 2026 (model card citation)1M by default (hosted); open weights 262,144 native, up to 1,010,000Not stated by AlibabaText, image (hosted); text only (open weights)
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2claude-fable-5-29 November 20261M128KText, image
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813)deepseek-v4-proNot stated by DeepSeek1M384KText (vision not supported)
GoogleGemini 4 Carbongemini-4-carbon10 November 2026 (GA on Google Cloud)1,048,576 (shared by input and output)Up to 1,048,576 with long decodes; 65,536 per streaming segmentText, image, audio, video
MetaMuse Wondermuse-wonder-1.012 October 2026 (announcement)1,048,576Not stated by MetaText, image, video, audio, PDF
MicrosoftMAI Thinking 1Not stated by Microsoft12 August 2026 (public preview on Microsoft Foundry, introduction post)256KNot stated by MicrosoftText
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3MiniMax-M3Not stated by MiniMax (paper published 11 June 2026)1MNot stated by MiniMaxText, image, video
Mistral AIMistral Large 4mistral-large-4 (also mistral-large-4-0, mistral-large-latest)5 November 2026 (version 26.10, GA)1MNot stated by Mistral AIText, image
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 Prokimi-k3.1-proNot stated by Moonshot AI1,048,576Not stated by Moonshot AIText, image
OpenAIGPT-6 Astragpt-6-astra3 September 20261,050,000128,000Text, image
xAIGrok 4.7grok-4.721 September 2026500,000Not stated by xAIText, image
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.3glm-5.318 August 20261M128KText

Every model in the table outputs text. Several also offer reasoning or "thinking" modes: Z.ai states that GLM-5.3 reasoning is always enabled, with effort levels low, high and max; the Qwen3.8 open weights always begin with reasoning, while the hosted Qwen3.8-Max adds a non-thinking option; DeepSeek offers thinking (the default) and non-thinking modes. For background on these modes see Reasoning Models Explained.

When was each frontier model released?

Ordered by date, oldest first, using only dates the providers publish. Models with no published date are listed after the timeline.

  1. August 2026: Qwen3.8 open weights (the Hugging Face citation gives August 2026; Qwen3.8-Max is the hosted version).
  2. 12 August 2026: MAI Thinking 1 enters public preview on Microsoft Foundry, per Microsoft AI's introduction post.
  3. 18 August 2026: GLM-5.3 released, per Z.ai's release notes.
  4. 3 September 2026: GPT-6 Astra released in the OpenAI API, described in the changelog as "our most capable model, built for the hardest end-to-end work".
  5. 21 September 2026: Grok 4.7 made available on the xAI API as grok-4.7.
  6. 12 October 2026: Meta announces Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full.
  7. 5 November 2026: Mistral Large 4 version 26.10 reaches GA, per its model card.
  8. 9 November 2026: Anthropic launches Claude Fable 5.2 and, for verified organisations, Claude Mythos 5.2.
  9. 10 November 2026: Gemini 4 Carbon reaches GA on Google Cloud.

Not dated on the pages checked: DeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813), Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiniMax-M3 (its sparse attention paper is dated 11 June 2026). The LLM Release Tracker keeps a running, dated list of releases across all providers.

How much do frontier models cost?

As of 2026-11-15. US dollars per million tokens, standard tier, as listed on each provider's pricing or model page. Cached input is the price for cache hits or cached reads. Prices change often; check the linked pricing page before budgeting.

ProviderModelInputCached inputOutputPricing notes from the provider
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8-Max2.00Not stated by Alibaba (caching discount supported)6.00Singapore and US (Virginia) rows; the Global deployment row is 1.65 input and 4.951 output; single tier up to 1M tokens
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.28.000.2040.00Batch 4.00 input and 20.00 output; 5-minute cache writes 10.00, 1-hour 16.00; fast mode 16.00 and 80.00; US-only inference adds a 1.1x multiplier
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813)1.32 (peak)0.044 (peak)3.96 (peak)Off-peak is half the peak rate; peak hours are 01:00 to 04:00 and 06:00 to 10:00 UTC, Monday to Friday
GoogleGemini 4 CarbonNot stated by Google on the pages checkedNot stated by Google on the pages checkedNot stated by Google on the pages checkedGoogle Cloud supports Standard and Priority PayGo, Batch and Provisioned Throughput for this model
MetaMuse Wonder4.000.2020.00Standard mode only; not offered in Contributor mode
MicrosoftMAI Thinking 1Not stated by MicrosoftNot stated by MicrosoftNot stated by MicrosoftPlayground pricing not stated
MiniMaxMiniMax-M30.30 (up to 512K input)0.061.20Above 512K input: 0.60, 0.12 and 2.40; prices include a stated permanent 50% discount; Priority tier is 1.5x Standard
Mistral AIMistral Large 40.700.072.10From the model card
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 ProNot stated by Moonshot AI on the pages checkedNot stated by Moonshot AI on the pages checkedNot stated by Moonshot AI on the pages checkedPricing is on the Kimi platform pricing page
OpenAIGPT-6 Astra10.001.0050.00Cache writes 12.50; prompts over 272K input tokens cost 2x input and cache rates and 1.5x output for the whole request
xAIGrok 4.72.000.506.00Higher rates apply to requests over 200K tokens
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.31.400.264.40Cached input storage listed as free for a limited time

Headline per-token prices are only part of the cost. Reasoning tokens are usually billed as output, long-context surcharges change the rate for the whole request on some models, and batch, off-peak or priority tiers move the price in either direction. Model Pricing Explained covers how tokens and caching are billed, and the LLM Pricing Tracker follows price changes across providers.

What is the context window of each frontier model?

The context window is the total number of tokens a model can consider in one request. The figures in the first table are the providers' own. Three points matter when comparing them:

  • Shared or separate limits: Google states that Gemini 4 Carbon's 1,048,576-token limit is shared by input and output, while OpenAI lists a 1,050,000-token context and a separate 128,000-token output limit for GPT-6 Astra.
  • Hosted versus open weights: the Qwen3.8 open weights are 262,144 tokens natively, extensible to 1,010,000; the hosted Qwen3.8-Max uses 1M by default.
  • Price tiers by length: MiniMax prices M3 in two tiers split at 512K input tokens, OpenAI changes GPT-6 Astra's rate above 272K, and xAI changes Grok 4.7's rate above 200K.

See Context Windows Explained and LLM Context Windows Compared Across Providers for a wider view.

Is any frontier model open source?

Six of the twelve flagships publish model weights on Hugging Face. "Open weights" means the trained parameters can be downloaded; the licence decides what you may do with them, and several are custom licences rather than standard open source licences. As of 2026-11-15.

ProviderModelOpen weightsLicenceParametersKnowledge cutoff
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8-MaxYes (Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B)Custom, listed as "qwen3.8-max"2.4T total, 95B active (mixture of experts)Not stated by Alibaba
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2NoProprietaryNot stated by AnthropicJune 2026 (reliable knowledge cutoff)
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813)YesMIT1.7T total; active count not statedNot stated by DeepSeek
GoogleGemini 4 CarbonNoProprietaryNot stated by GoogleMarch 2026
MetaMuse WonderNot stated by MetaNot stated by MetaNot stated by MetaNot stated by Meta
MicrosoftMAI Thinking 1Not stated by MicrosoftNot stated by MicrosoftAbout 1T total, about 35B active (sparse mixture of experts)Not stated by Microsoft
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3YesMiniMax community licenceAbout 428B total, about 23B activeNot stated by MiniMax
Mistral AIMistral Large 4Yes (Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B)Mistral Ecosystem Open Weight License1.05T total, 52B active, plus a 1.6B vision encoderNot stated by Mistral AI
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 ProYesKimi K3.1 Pro License (custom)2.8T total, 104B active (mixture of experts)Not stated by Moonshot AI
OpenAIGPT-6 AstraNoProprietaryNot stated by OpenAI30 April 2026
xAIGrok 4.7NoProprietaryNot stated by xAINot stated by xAI
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.3YesCustom, listed as "glm-5.3"753BNot stated by Z.ai

Running a model of this size yourself needs serious hardware: the smallest open flagship here, MiniMax-M3, has about 428B parameters. Open-Weight vs Closed Models Explained covers the trade-offs, and the Self-Hosted LLM Security Guide covers the controls you take on when you host weights.

Where are frontier models available?

As of 2026-11-15, from the pages checked. Availability on third-party clouds and model marketplaces changes often and is not listed unless the provider's page states it.

ProviderModelProvider API and appsOther routes stated by the provider
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Cloud Model Studio, with Singapore, US (Virginia) and Global deployment scopesOpen weights on Hugging Face, compatible with vLLM, SGLang and TokenSpeed
AnthropicClaude Fable 5.2Claude API, including fast mode and Batch APIClaude Mythos 5.2 offers the same capabilities to verified organisations
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V4-Pro (0813)DeepSeek API, concurrency limit 500Open weights on Hugging Face
GoogleGemini 4 CarbonGoogle Cloud (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform), Global plus US and EU multi-regionsA cybersecurity variant, Gemini 4 Carbon for cyber, is documented alongside it
MetaMuse WonderMeta Model API (preview) and Muse CodeMuse Wonder Full for Muse Code subscribers
MicrosoftMAI Thinking 1MAI Playground, for personal, non-commercial useMicrosoft Foundry for enterprise evaluation and deployment
MiniMaxMiniMax-M3MiniMax API, Standard and Priority tiersOpen weights on Hugging Face
Mistral AIMistral Large 4Mistral APIOpen weights on Hugging Face
Moonshot AIKimi K3.1 ProKimi platform API (platform.kimi.ai)Open weights on Hugging Face
OpenAIGPT-6 AstraOpenAI API: Responses, Chat Completions, Realtime, Batch and other endpointsNot stated on the model page
xAIGrok 4.7xAI API; us-east-1 listed, with regional pricing on other clustersNot stated on the model page
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-5.3Z.ai API and GLM Coding PlanOpen weights on Hugging Face

Restricted-access and preview models

Access status is stated plainly for every provider:

  • Anthropic: Claude Mythos 5.2 offers the same capabilities as Fable 5.2 only to organisations verified through Anthropic's verification programmes, such as the Cyber Verification Program. Fable 5.2 itself is generally available.
  • Google: Gemini 4 Carbon on Google Cloud is available "to verified enterprise customers in select regions", which Google links to platform reliability, capacity and security.
  • Meta: the Meta Model API documentation states that Muse Wonder is in preview; Muse Wonder Full is limited to Muse Code subscribers.
  • Microsoft: the MAI Playground is for personal, non-commercial use; enterprise use runs through Microsoft Foundry.
  • Others: the pages checked for Alibaba, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Mistral AI, Moonshot AI, OpenAI, xAI and Z.ai describe public API access for these flagships, with no verification step stated.

Benchmarks

Every lab publishes benchmark results for its own flagship, but each chooses its own tests, settings, reasoning effort and comparison models, so provider-reported scores are not comparable across labs. Meta's Muse Wonder announcement, for example, claims state-of-the-art agentic performance without giving scores and says a full report will follow. This page therefore lists no scores. When you compare benchmark figures, use the same benchmark version, the same effort setting and a dated independent source, and keep provider-reported and independent results apart. How to Read LLM Benchmarks explains what to check.

Data handling and security

Data handling is set by each provider's API terms and the deployment route, not by the model. Facts from the pages checked:

  • Data residency and region: Alibaba prices Qwen3.8-Max by deployment scope (Singapore, US, Global); Anthropic offers US-only inference for Fable 5.2 at a 1.1x multiplier; Google lists Global, US and EU options for Gemini 4 Carbon processing; xAI lists us-east-1 for Grok 4.7.
  • Training use: Meta offers a Contributor mode for Muse Spark at lower prices in exchange for training use; Muse Wonder is not offered in that mode. Check each provider's terms for your plan.
  • Self-hosting: open weights let you keep prompts inside your own environment, but you then own patching, access control and logging for the inference stack.
  • API keys: every hosted flagship is reached with an API key or cloud credential. Treat these as non-human identities: store them in a secrets manager, scope them per application and set spend limits. See the LLMjacking Guide and How to Set Spend Limits on LLM API Keys.

How to choose a frontier model: factual criteria

These are criteria, not recommendations. Score each candidate against your own workload and evaluations.

CriterionQuestion to answerWhere to find it
AccessCan your organisation use it today, or is verification, preview status or a subscription required?Restricted-access section above; provider model page
DeploymentDo you need hosted API only, a specific cloud region, or downloadable weights?Availability and open weights tables
LicenceDoes the licence allow your commercial use, fine-tuning and redistribution?The licence file linked from the model card
Context and outputDoes your longest prompt plus expected output fit, and is the limit shared?At-a-glance table
Input typesDo you need image, audio, video or PDF input?At-a-glance table
Cost at your volumeWhat is the blended cost with caching, reasoning tokens, long-context tiers and batch?Pricing table and provider pricing page
Data handlingWhere is data processed, how long is it kept, and is it used for training?Provider API terms and data controls
Change and retirementHow often does the provider replace models and how much notice does it give?LLM Deprecation and Retirement Tracker

For a smaller organisation, a hosted API with published pricing and no verification step is usually the quickest route to a pilot. A larger organisation with residency or sovereignty requirements will weigh regional processing options and open weights more heavily, and should plan for the operating cost of self-hosting.

Practitioner checklist

  • Pin production code to an explicit API ID and record the model, version and date in your AI inventory.
  • Run your own evaluation set on two or three candidates before switching; do not rely on provider-reported scores alone.
  • Model the full cost, including reasoning tokens, cache writes, long-context surcharges and peak or priority tiers.
  • Read the licence file before downloading open weights, and record the licence in your software bill of materials.
  • Confirm access status (general availability, preview, verified only) before committing a delivery date.
  • Check region and data residency options against your data protection obligations.
  • Store API keys in a secrets manager, scope them per application and set spend alerts.
  • Review provider release and deprecation pages monthly; flagships are being replaced every few months.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Small and Low-Cost LLMs Compared, Coding LLMs Compared, LLM Release Tracker, LLM Security Guide.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 15 November 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org