Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Glossary› Cyber Security› CSA STAR Registry
Cyber Security

CSA STAR Registry

← Back to Glossary
By NHI Mgmt Group Updated October 31, 2026 Domain: Cyber Security

The CSA STAR Registry is a public registry where cloud providers can publish their security self-assessments and related assurance information. For procurement teams, it provides a reusable reference point for checking a provider’s stated controls and reducing repeated questionnaire work during vendor review.

What the CSA STAR Registry Is For

The CSA STAR Registry is best understood as a trust and assurance reference point, not a certification database in isolation. It helps buyers, security teams, and procurement functions compare a cloud provider’s stated controls, self-assessments, and related evidence in one public place, which can reduce repetitive questionnaire exchange during vendor review.

That makes the registry useful at the decision stage of cloud procurement, where organisations need a consistent way to compare providers without rebuilding the same review from scratch each time.

How the Registry Fits Cloud Assurance

In practice, the registry sits between a provider’s security posture and a buyer’s assurance process. It gives organisations a way to see whether a provider has published a self-assessment, what kind of assurance artefacts are available, and how those materials can support a supplier review. NHIMG’s Cloud Security Alliance CCM and STAR Guide covers the CSA STAR programme, the STAR Registry, and how CCM and CAIQ artefacts are used together.

The registry is therefore most valuable when it is treated as a structured input to assurance, not as proof of security by itself. Buyers still need to understand scope, what was assessed, and whether the evidence actually matches the service being purchased.

What Buyers Look for in a STAR Listing

Most buyers use a STAR listing to answer a few practical questions: does the provider publish a current assessment, is the evidence reusable across reviews, and does the artefact help reduce back-and-forth during due diligence? Those questions are similar to the way teams use other third-party assurance resources, especially when a cloud service will be reviewed by legal, procurement, security, and risk stakeholders.

For that reason, the registry is often most useful when paired with a broader vendor review process. NHIMG’s Security Vendor Evaluation and RFP Guide explains how scorable RFP requirements, questionnaires, and proof-of-concept checks fit into a structured buying decision.

Where teams are comparing several third-party assurance options, a side-by-side view of certification, attestation, and registry-based evidence can also help. The Third-Party Attestation Comparison Map places CSA STAR alongside other common assurance signals used in supplier review.

Why the Registry Matters for Reusable Assurance

The main value of the registry is reuse. A well-structured public listing can reduce duplicated questionnaires, lower review friction, and give buyers a common baseline for comparing cloud providers. It is especially helpful where the same provider is being assessed by multiple customers, because the same evidence can be referenced repeatedly instead of recreated for each deal.

That said, reusable assurance works only when organisations read the listing carefully. A public registry can improve transparency, but it does not remove the need to check service scope, recency, and fit for the intended use case. For that reason, the registry should be seen as an input to governance, not a substitute for it.

How It Relates to Other Cloud Security Artefacts

The CSA STAR Registry sits within a wider cloud assurance ecosystem that includes control frameworks, questionnaires, and independent attestations. Its role is narrower than a full control standard, but it is more operationally useful than a static marketing claim because it gives buyers a place to find published assurance material and use it in review workflows.

When cloud teams need to understand how STAR relates to the underlying control model, the CSA Cloud Controls Matrix is the natural companion reference. The CSA Cloud Controls Matrix is the control framework behind much of the CSA assurance conversation, and it helps explain what kinds of controls a registry listing may be summarising.

For cloud assurance more broadly, the registry is one part of how buyers shorten review cycles while still preserving due diligence. It is most effective when organisations use it to validate claims, compare providers consistently, and focus deeper review where the published evidence leaves open questions.

Standards & Framework Alignment

This section maps relevant standards and security frameworks to the operational risks and controls described in this guidance.

CSA Cloud Controls Matrix, NIST CSF 2.0 and CIS Controls v8 set the governance and control requirements practitioners need to meet.

FrameworkControl / ReferenceRelevance
CSA Cloud Controls MatrixIAM — Identity and Access ManagementSTAR listings commonly summarise cloud control posture, including access and identity assurances.
GRC — Governance, Risk, and ComplianceThe registry is a cloud assurance mechanism used for governance and vendor risk review.
Recommendation — Map provider assurance claims to IAM controls before accepting them in vendor due diligence. Use GRC controls to verify that published STAR evidence is current, scoped, and reviewable.
NIST CSF 2.0GV.SC-01 — Governance of Supply Chain RiskSTAR supports supplier assurance and third-party review of cloud providers.
ID.AM-02 — Software, Hardware, Data, and External Service InventoriesUsing STAR well depends on knowing which cloud services and vendors are in scope.
Recommendation — Use supply-chain governance to evaluate third-party cloud assurance before procurement. Maintain an inventory of cloud providers and services before relying on registry evidence.
CIS Controls v8CIS-15 — Service Provider ManagementThe registry is used to assess and track cloud service provider assurance.
Recommendation — Apply service-provider management to standardize how STAR evidence is reviewed and tracked.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Reviewed and updated by the NHIMG editorial team on October 31, 2026.
NHI Mgmt Group — the #1 independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org