Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home Glossary Cyber Security Open Data Formats
Cyber Security

Open Data Formats

← Back to Glossary
By NHI Mgmt Group Updated August 27, 2026 Domain: Cyber Security

Open data formats are standardised file or table formats that remain readable by multiple tools and platforms. In security operations, they reduce lock-in, simplify integration, and make it easier to move telemetry between analytics, detection, and machine learning workflows without rewriting pipelines or losing context.

Expanded Definition

Open data formats are standardised representations of structured information that can be read, validated, and transferred by multiple tools without relying on a single vendor’s proprietary parser. In NHI security, that usually means telemetry, audit logs, inventory exports, and detection outputs remain usable across SIEM, data lake, analytics, and automation workflows.

Definitions vary across vendors when “open” is used loosely to describe merely exportable data. In practice, the security value comes from durable schema clarity, documented field meaning, and predictable encoding that support long-term interoperability. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 is relevant here because security operations depend on portable, actionable evidence, not just raw data movement. For NHI programs, this matters when service account events, secrets activity, and agent actions must be correlated across platforms without rewriting pipelines.

The most common misapplication is treating CSV export as sufficient openness, which occurs when the file can be downloaded but its fields, timestamps, and identifiers are inconsistent or undocumented.

Examples and Use Cases

Implementing open data formats rigorously often introduces schema governance overhead, requiring organisations to weigh portability and automation against the cost of standardisation and validation.

  • Security teams export NHI inventory data in a shared schema so access reviews can be run in a separate analytics platform without manual remapping.
  • Detection engineers publish authentication and secrets events in JSON or Parquet so SIEM, SOAR, and model training pipelines can reuse the same records.
  • Platform teams store agent tool-call logs in an open table format so incident responders can trace execution paths across environments.
  • Governance teams use portable event schemas to compare rotation and revocation activity across business units, then align findings with the Ultimate Guide to NHIs — Key Research and Survey Results.
  • Teams adopt common serialisation rules aligned to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 so evidence can move between collection, analysis, and reporting stages without loss of context.

Open formats become especially useful when multiple teams need to query the same evidence with different tools, but the underlying record structure must remain stable enough to support incident reconstruction and audit.

Why It Matters in NHI Security

Open data formats reduce lock-in, but their real security value is operational: they make it easier to prove what an NHI did, when it did it, and which system observed it. That matters because NHI environments are already high-volume and hard to govern. NHIMG research shows that only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts, which means opaque or proprietary data layouts can deepen an existing visibility gap rather than solve it. The Ultimate Guide to NHIs — Key Research and Survey Results also shows that 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, making portable telemetry essential for privilege analysis and anomaly detection.

For practitioners, the governance lesson is simple: if logs, exports, and workflow records cannot travel cleanly between systems, it becomes harder to detect misuse, investigate compromise, or rotate credentials at speed. Open formats also support broader resilience goals reflected in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0, especially when evidence must be retained, shared, and analysed under pressure. Organisations typically encounter the cost of poor portability only after an incident, at which point open data formats become operationally unavoidable to reconstruct activity and contain blast radius.

Standards & Framework Alignment

This section maps relevant standards and security frameworks to the operational risks and controls described in this guidance.

OWASP Non-Human Identity Top 10 address the attack and risk surface, while NIST CSF 2.0 and NIST AI RMF set the governance and control requirements practitioners need to meet.

FrameworkControl / ReferenceRelevance
NIST CSF 2.0RC.IM-1Open formats support incident evidence sharing and analysis across tools.
NIST AI RMFPortable, well-described data improves AI governance and traceability.
OWASP Non-Human Identity Top 10NHI-06NHI telemetry portability helps detect abuse and anomalous identity behavior.

Standardise NHI event records so detection, review, and response teams can correlate activity consistently.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Reviewed and updated by the NHIMG editorial team on August 27, 2026.
NHI Mgmt Group — the #1 independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM, and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org