Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› MITRE ATT&CK T1123 Audio Capture: Detecting Data Gathering
Guide SOC & Detection Engineering

MITRE ATT&CK T1123 Audio Capture: Detecting Data Gathering

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 12 November 2026 11 min read
On this page

Audio Capture (T1123) turns the microphone on a laptop, desktop or meeting room PC into a listening device, and the conversations it records (deal talks, board calls, incident bridges, passwords read aloud) are often worth more than the files an intruder can steal. ATT&CK v20 places T1123 in the Collection tactic (TA0009) on Windows, Linux and macOS, with no sub-techniques and no formal mitigations, which makes detection and operating system privacy controls the main defences. This page covers how adversaries use the technique, the behaviour chain ATT&CK v20 tells you to detect on each platform, the microphone controls Windows and macOS give administrators, how to test, and where it maps in common frameworks. It is written for detection engineers and endpoint owners. For the consumer device side (smart speakers and voice assistants), see the Smart Speaker and Voice Assistant Privacy Guide; this page stays on the ATT&CK technique view.

Key takeaways

  • It is a feature of commodity and state tooling alike. ATT&CK v20 lists more than 30 procedure examples, from remote access trojans such as DarkComet, NanoCore and Remcos to espionage frameworks such as Flame, TajMahal and MgBot.
  • Detect the chain, not the API call. ATT&CK v20 detection strategy DET0221 pairs an unusual process opening audio devices with audio files written to temp or user folders, then exfiltration.
  • Call applications are a target too. T9000 recorded Skype calls through the Skype API, TajMahal captured VoIP application audio, and ATT&CK records VOID MANTICORE gathering audio during a Zoom session.
  • Privacy controls are your mitigations. ATT&CK v20 maps no M-series mitigation to T1123, so Windows app privacy policies, macOS TCC and PPPC profiles, and hardware mute carry the preventive load.
  • Executives and meeting rooms come first. Prioritise devices where sensitive conversations happen: executive laptops, board room PCs and incident response bridges.

What T1123 is

ATT&CK describes Audio Capture as using a computer's peripheral devices (microphones and webcams) or applications (voice and video call services) to record audio and listen in on sensitive conversations. Malware or scripts talk to the device through an API provided by the operating system or an application, and the recordings are usually written to disk and exfiltrated later. The audio APIs involved are ordinary ones:

  • Windows: the multimedia libraries (ATT&CK's analytic names winmm.dll and avrt.dll), the Media Control Interface (NightClub used mciSendStringW with the LAME encoder), and call application APIs.
  • Linux: ALSA and PulseAudio devices, and capture utilities such as arecord.
  • macOS: the AVFoundation and CoreAudio frameworks. LightSpy used AVFoundation to record audio and packaged it as JSON for exfiltration.

Audio Capture sits beside Screen Capture (T1113), Video Capture (T1125, see the MITRE ATT&CK T1125 Video Capture) and Input Capture (T1056) in the same surveillance modules. See the MITRE ATT&CK T1056 Input Capture and the ATT&CK Collection Tactic Guide.

How adversaries use it: real cases

Every row below is an ATT&CK v20 procedure example with its cited source.

Actor or softwareWhat ATT&CK recordsDefender lesson
APT37 (G0067)Used an audio capturing utility known as SOUNDWAVE to capture microphone input (FireEye, February 2018)State groups ship dedicated audio tools, not just RAT plugins
VOID MANTICORE (G1055)Gathered audio during a Zoom session (FBI IC3 flash on Handala activity, March 2026)Meeting clients are a collection surface; log which processes use the microphone during calls
T9000 (S0098)Used the Skype API to record audio and video calls, writing encrypted data under %APPDATA%\Intel\Skype (Palo Alto Networks, February 2016)Abuse of a call application's own API looks like the application working normally
TajMahal (S0467)Captures VoIP application audio on an infected host (Kaspersky, April 2019)Monitor modules loaded into softphone processes
LightSpy (S1185)Uses Apple's AVFoundation framework to capture audio, transformed into JSON blobs for exfiltration (Huntress, 2024)macOS is in scope; TCC microphone decisions are the key log
MgBot (S1146)Captures input and output audio streams (ESET and Symantec, 2023)Output capture records both sides of a call
Flame (S0143)Records audio using any existing hardware recording device (Kaspersky)Long-running espionage favours low, steady recording
PowerSploit (S0194)Get-MicrophoneAudio module records system microphone audioOpen-source frameworks put the capability within reach of any intruder

Commodity RATs (DarkComet, NanoCore, Remcos, jRAT, Revenge RAT) appear in the same list, so audio capture is not limited to targeted espionage. See the AsyncRAT, Remcos and njRAT Commodity RATs Guide, the APT37 Threat Actor Profile Guide and the Commercial Spyware Guide.

What to detect and where

ATT&CK v20 detection strategy DET0221 has one analytic per platform. Each looks for an unexpected process touching audio input, followed by audio files on disk.

Platform (analytic)BehaviourLog sources named in v20
Windows (AN0619)Unusual or unauthorised processes accessing microphone APIs (winmm.dll, avrt.dll), then audio file writes to user-accessible or temp foldersSysmon 10 (process access), Sysmon 11 (file creation), Security 4688 (process creation)
Linux (AN0620)Processes accessing ALSA or PulseAudio devices or running capture binaries such as arecord, then file creation or suspicious child processesauditd SYSCALL open and write, Sysmon for Linux event 1
macOS (AN0621)Processes invoking AVFoundation or CoreAudio, microphone access in TCC or unified logs, then AIFF, WAV or MP3 writesUnified log (audio APIs), TCC microphone access events, fs_usage file I/O

Turning the analytics into rules

  • Build an allow-list of microphone users: meeting clients, softphones, dictation and accessibility tools, browsers. Any other process opening the audio stack is a lead. On Windows 11, the Settings app keeps a seven-day app usage history for the microphone and camera that helps build the baseline on sample machines.
  • Weight by process path and signer: unsigned binaries, scripts hosts (PowerShell, wscript), and anything running from AppData, Temp, /tmp or ~/Library deserve the highest score.
  • Watch for audio files in odd places: .wav, .mp3, .ogg, .aiff or .amr files created repeatedly in temp or hidden folders, especially in fixed-size chunks or at regular intervals.
  • Chain to exfiltration: growth in archive files or outbound transfers shortly after audio file creation links the collection to Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) or Automated Exfiltration (T1020).
  • Look inside call clients: unsigned or unexpected modules loaded into Teams, Zoom or softphone processes are a stronger signal than the call client using the microphone.
  • Use the TCC record on macOS: a new kTCCServiceMicrophone grant to a binary outside your software catalogue is a high-value alert.

Mitigations and preventive controls

ATT&CK v20 maps no M-series mitigation to T1123, because recording audio is a normal use of system features. The controls below are NHI Mgmt Group recommendations built on platform documentation.

ControlPlatformSetting or mechanismWhat it stops
App privacy policy for the microphoneWindowsPolicy CSP Privacy area (./Device/Vendor/MSFT/Policy/Config/Privacy/), Group Policy Windows Components > App Privacy; on Windows 11 24H2 and later, LetAppsAccessMicrophone_ForceDenyTheseNamespaces and LetAppsAccessMicrophone_ForceDenyUnsigned cover unpackaged desktop appsUnsigned or unapproved desktop apps opening the microphone
Privacy Preferences Policy Control (PPPC) profilemacOSPayload com.apple.TCC.configuration-profile-policy; Apple documents the Microphone setting as a way to deny specified apps access; supervised, MDM-installedNamed apps being granted microphone access by a user prompt
Application controlAllWDAC (App Control for Business), AppLocker, fapolicyd, Santa-style allow-listsUnknown capture tools and RAT payloads running at all
Hardware and physical controlsAllMicrophone disabled in firmware on kiosks and shared devices, hardware mute in meeting roomsRecording on devices that never need a microphone
Endpoint detectionAllEDR telemetry for device handle and module load eventsGives the analytics above their data

Two limits to plan for. First, Windows camera and microphone policies were historically scoped to packaged (Store and MSIX) apps; the desktop app namespace and unsigned controls are what reach classic Win32 malware, and they need Windows 11 24H2 or later. Second, the Windows and macOS privacy prompts protect against unknown apps, not against malicious code running inside an app that already has microphone permission, which is why module load monitoring in call clients matters. See the macOS TCC and Privacy Permissions Management Guide, the App Control for Business (WDAC) and the M1038 Execution Prevention.

Decision guidance

  • Small organisations: rely on EDR alerts for unexpected microphone access, deny the microphone on shared and kiosk devices, and educate executives about the system tray and menu bar recording indicators that show when a microphone is in use.
  • Larger organisations: deploy the Windows namespace deny lists and macOS PPPC profiles through MDM, build the DET0221 chain in the SIEM, and run quarterly reviews of which apps hold microphone permission.
  • High-risk roles: for executives, legal and M&A teams, add dedicated meeting room hardware with physical mute and keep sensitive discussions off general-purpose laptops. See the Executive and VIP Device Protection Guide.

Where identity fits

Recorded audio is a credential source. Help desk calls, incident bridges and pairing sessions regularly contain one-time codes, recovery answers and API keys read aloud. Treat any confirmed audio capture on a device used for such calls as a credential exposure: rotate secrets and tokens discussed on recorded calls, and review service account and break-glass passwords that were spoken during the exposure window. Recorded voices also feed voice cloning for social engineering, so tighten call-back verification for password resets.

How to test

  1. Plan: agree scope and data handling with legal and HR, since test recordings may capture real conversations. Use a lab device or a muted room.
  2. Emulate safely: on a test host, run a benign script or an authorised emulation framework module that opens the default microphone and writes a short audio file to a temp folder.
  3. Verify telemetry: confirm process creation, device access and file creation events reach the SIEM for each platform, plus the TCC decision on macOS.
  4. Verify the rule: the DET0221 chain should alert within your target time, and the allow-listed meeting client should not.
  5. Verify prevention: confirm the namespace deny list or PPPC profile blocks an unapproved binary and logs the decision.
  6. Roll back: remove test binaries and recordings, and record exceptions created during the test.

Measures: share of endpoints with microphone policy deployed, number of apps holding microphone permission per platform, mean time to alert in tests, and number of unexplained microphone-access alerts per month after tuning.

Common failure patterns

  • Treating every microphone user as normal: without an allow-list the alert volume from meeting clients drowns the signal, so the rule gets disabled.
  • Store-app-only policy: a privacy policy that covers only packaged apps leaves classic desktop malware untouched.
  • Ignoring call client internals: injected modules inside a trusted call client inherit its permission and its normal-looking behaviour.
  • No macOS telemetry: LightSpy, MacMa and MacSpy all record audio on macOS, yet many SOCs collect little from Macs.
  • Missing the credential angle: confirmed recording without rotating what was said on calls leaves stolen secrets valid.

Framework mapping

FrameworkReferenceRelevance
MITRE ATT&CK v20T1123, TA0009, DET0221 (AN0619, AN0620, AN0621)Technique and detection strategy
MITRE ATT&CK v20T1125, T1113, T1056, T1041, T1020Related collection and follow-on exfiltration techniques
MITRE D3FENDD3-SCA System Call Analysis, D3-FCA File Creation Analysis, D3-EAL Executable AllowlistingDevice access analysis, audio file creation, blocking unknown tools
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5SC-42 Sensor Capability and Data, SC-15 Collaborative Computing Devices and Applications, SI-4, CM-7(5)Sensor control, meeting devices, monitoring, allow-listing
NIST CSF 2.0DE.CM-09, DE.AE-02, PR.PS-05Endpoint monitoring, analysis, unauthorised software prevention

Practitioner checklist

  • Build an allow-list of processes permitted to use the microphone on each platform.
  • Implement DET0221 as a chain: device access, audio file creation, outbound transfer.
  • Deploy Windows microphone deny lists for unsigned and unapproved desktop apps on Windows 11 24H2 and later.
  • Deploy a macOS PPPC profile that denies microphone access to apps that never need it.
  • Collect TCC decisions and unified log audio events from Macs.
  • Alert on unsigned modules loaded into call clients and softphones.
  • Disable microphones on kiosks and shared devices that do not need them.
  • Rotate secrets read aloud on calls from any device with confirmed audio capture.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: ATT&CK Collection Tactic Guide · VoIP and SIP Security Guide · Microsoft Teams Security Guide · macOS Detection and Response Guide · Sysmon Guide

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 12 November 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org