Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Patchwork Threat Actor Profile Guide: South Asia espionage…
Guide Threat Intelligence & Threat Actors

Patchwork Threat Actor Profile Guide: South Asia espionage tradecraft and practical defences

PDF for newsletter subscribers · free to read online

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 27 October 2026 11 min read
On this page

Patchwork is a long-running espionage group that wins with old Office exploits, copied code and convincing lures, which means any organisation still opening unpatched RTF and Office files from email is in its reach. Researchers have tracked it since late 2015 under names such as Dropping Elephant, Chinastrats and MONSOON, and its targets cluster around governments, defence, diplomacy, think tanks and universities with an interest in South Asia and China. This profile is for SOC analysts, email and endpoint engineers and threat intelligence teams in those sectors. It covers the names and attribution exactly as each source states them, the ATT&CK techniques mapped to the group, how it uses stolen credentials and trusted signatures, notable campaigns, and a detection and hardening plan. General background on how groups are named and tracked is in the Threat Actor Groups Guide.

Key takeaways

  • Old exploits still work for it. ATT&CK lists CVE-2012-0158, CVE-2014-4114, CVE-2017-0199 and CVE-2017-8570 among the flaws Patchwork has exploited, and Malwarebytes saw Equation Editor RTF exploits in late 2021. All are in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue.
  • Lures are copied from real organisations. Volexity saw 2018 emails that reused genuine think tank content from CFR, CSIS and MERICS; Malwarebytes saw documents impersonating Pakistani authorities.
  • It tracks who opens its mail. Per-recipient tracking images (web bugs) let the operators see which targets open messages before sending the payload.
  • Tooling is a mix of custom and open source. BADNEWS (including the Ragnatela variant), AutoIt backdoors, QuasarRAT, PowerSploit and Meterpreter all appear in public reporting.
  • Patching Office and blocking macros removes most of the chain. Disabling Equation Editor, enforcing Office updates and controlling DLL side-loading address the techniques this group repeats.

Who they are (names and aliases)

MITRE ATT&CK tracks the group as Patchwork (G0040), a cyber espionage group first observed in December 2015. ATT&CK states that the group has not been definitively attributed, but that circumstantial evidence suggests it may be a pro-Indian or Indian entity, and that much of its code was copied and pasted from online forums. Kaspersky described Dropping Elephant in 2016 as likely operating from India, noting attacker logins through VPNs and sometimes an ordinary Indian ISP. Volexity called Patchwork an Indian APT group, and Malwarebytes described it as an Indian threat actor, citing the dual English and Indian keyboard layouts on the operator's own machine. No government attribution has been published in the sources reviewed for this page, so treat these as vendor assessments.

NameTracked byNotes
PatchworkATT&CK, Volexity, MalwarebytesMost common public name; named for its copy and paste code
Dropping Elephant, ChinastratsKasperskyKaspersky reported activity since at least November 2015
MONSOONForcepointListed as an alias in ATT&CK
Hangover Group, Operation HangoverNorman (2013), listed in ATT&CKATT&CK groups the 2013 Hangover reporting with Patchwork
Hangover (also Neon, Viceroy Tiger)Palo Alto Networks Unit 42Unit 42 attributed BackConfig to Hangover; ATT&CK maps BackConfig to Patchwork

Vendors do not all draw the cluster boundary in the same place. Unit 42's BackConfig report uses the Hangover name and does not mention Patchwork, while ATT&CK merges the two. Keep the vendor's own name in your intelligence records so a later split does not corrupt your history. South Asian activity is also often confused with SideWinder, which uses similar lures and exploits but is tracked separately.

Targeting and motivation

  • Government and diplomacy: ATT&CK and Kaspersky describe diplomatic and government targets, with Kaspersky linking victims to China's foreign relations.
  • Pakistan: Malwarebytes reports that Patchwork usually targets Pakistan; in late 2021 victims included Pakistan's Ministry of Defence, a national defence university and several universities and research institutes, including faculty in molecular medicine and biological sciences.
  • Think tanks: Volexity observed three campaigns in March and April 2018 against US think tanks, with lures built around CFR, CSIS, MERICS and FPRI branding.
  • South Asian government and military (Hangover cluster): Unit 42 saw BackConfig delivered to a government department and a military organisation in South Asia, with lures themed on Pakistani government programmes and files hosted on compromised sites in Pakistan, Bangladesh and the Maldives.
  • Motivation: intelligence collection. The tooling focuses on document theft, keylogging, screenshots and browser credentials rather than disruption or financial gain.

Tactics and techniques (MITRE ATT&CK)

All techniques below are mapped to G0040 in ATT&CK v20. Software mapped to the group includes BADNEWS (S0128), BackConfig (S0475), NDiskMonitor (S0272), TINYTYPHON (S0131), AutoIt backdoor (S0129), Unknown Logger (S0130), QuasarRAT (S0262) and PowerSploit (S0194).

TacticTechniqueHow it shows up
ReconnaissanceT1598.003 Spearphishing LinkZero-size tracking images with per-recipient identifiers
Resource developmentT1587.002 Code Signing Certificates; T1588.002 ToolSelf-signed certificates in the names of real or fictitious software firms; QuasarRAT and other open-source tools
Initial accessT1566.001 Spearphishing Attachment; T1566.002 Spearphishing Link; T1189 Drive-by CompromiseRTF and Office attachments, links to lookalike or compromised sites, fake news sites serving PowerPoint files
ExecutionT1203 Exploitation for Client Execution; T1204.002 Malicious File; T1559.002 Dynamic Data ExchangeOffice and OLE exploits, macros behind a "click the icon" lure, DDE delivery
ExecutionT1059.001 PowerShell; T1059.005 Visual Basic; T1059.003 Windows Command ShellPowerSploit downloads, VBS on victims, reverse shells
PersistenceT1053.005 Scheduled Task; T1547.001 Registry Run Keys / Startup FolderVolexity saw a task named Microsoft_Security_Task; startup entries such as "Baidu Software Update" and "Net Monitor"
Stealth, persistenceT1197 BITS Jobs; T1574.001 DLL side-loadingBITS downloads of payloads; BADNEWS loaded through a signed executable and a planted DLL
Privilege escalationT1548.002 Bypass User Account Control; T1055.012 Process HollowingUAC bypass hidden inside a hollowed svchost.exe
StealthT1036.005 Match Legitimate Name or Location; T1553.002 Code SigningSoftware update names and signed binaries to blend in
Credential accessT1555.003 Credentials from Web BrowsersChrome Login Data database copied from the user profile
CollectionT1119 Automated Collection; T1074.001 Local Data StagingFile stealers sweeping drives for document extensions into a staging folder
Command and controlT1102.001 Dead Drop Resolver; T1132.001 Standard EncodingEncrypted C2 addresses hidden in comments on legitimate websites; Base64 traffic
Lateral movementT1021.001 Remote Desktop ProtocolAttempts to move by RDP

The exploited vulnerabilities are the most useful detail for defenders, because each one has a patch and a known detection.

CVEProductCISA KEVWhere reported
CVE-2012-0158MSCOMCTL.OCX (Office)YesKaspersky, ATT&CK
CVE-2014-4114Windows OLEYesATT&CK
CVE-2017-0199Office and WordPadYesATT&CK
CVE-2017-8570Office (Composite Moniker)YesVolexity, ATT&CK
CVE-2017-11882Office Equation EditorYesUnit 42 (Hangover BackConfig RTF); Malwarebytes describes an Equation Editor exploit

How they abuse identities and credentials

Patchwork does not depend on directory attacks. Its identity abuse is quieter: harvesting what the user's browser remembers, logging into stolen mailboxes and borrowing trust from code signatures and real brands.

Trust abusedWhat the actor doesControl that limits it
Saved browser passwordsCopies the Chrome Login Data database (T1555.003); Kaspersky saw Chrome credential theft in 2016Disable browser password saving on managed devices through policy; use an enterprise password manager with phishing-resistant MFA
Stolen mailbox and web accountsMalwarebytes observed the operators logging into victims' stolen email and other accounts through VPN servicesConditional access, impossible-travel and anonymising VPN detection, rapid session revocation after any endpoint infection
Code signingSelf-signed certificates impersonating vendors such as Foxit and NVIDIA (Unit 42)Application control that trusts specific publishers, not any signature; alert on self-signed binaries in user-writable paths
Brand and sender trustCopied think tank content and government forms; lookalike domainsDMARC enforcement for your own domains, lookalike domain monitoring, external sender tagging
The user's local rightsUAC bypass to gain elevated rightsRemove local admin from users; set UAC to always notify; manage local admin passwords with LAPS

For the wider session theft problem, see the AiTM Phishing Guide.

Notable incidents

DateActivitySource
2013Operation Hangover report on an Indian attack infrastructure; ATT&CK groups it with PatchworkNorman, via ATT&CK
November 2015 to 2016Dropping Elephant campaigns against diplomatic and economic targets with watering-hole news sites and Office exploitsKaspersky, 8 July 2016
March to April 2018Three spearphishing campaigns against US think tanks delivering QuasarRAT via CVE-2017-8570Volexity, 7 June 2018
2017 to 2020BackConfig delivered to South Asian government and military targets through compromised sites and macro-laden XLS filesUnit 42, 11 May 2020 (named Hangover)
November to December 2021Ragnatela (BADNEWS variant) campaign against Pakistan's Ministry of Defence, universities and researchers; operators infected their own machineMalwarebytes, 7 January 2022

Detection and defence

Detection signals

SignalWhere to lookNotes
EQNEDT32.EXE starting at allProcess creation (Event ID 4688, Sysmon 1)Equation Editor should not run on patched estates; any execution is suspicious
WINWORD.EXE or EXCEL.EXE spawning cmd.exe, wscript.exe, powershell.exe or bitsadmin.exeEDR process treesExploit or macro execution
New scheduled tasks with security or update style namesEvent ID 4698, Sysmon 1 for schtasks.exeVolexity's Microsoft_Security_Task is the pattern
BITS jobs created by non-system processesMicrosoft-Windows-Bits-Client/Operational log (Event IDs 3, 59)Payload download
A signed executable loading a DLL from the same user-writable folderSysmon Event ID 7 (image load)DLL side-loading, as with the Ragnatela jli.dll loader
Non-browser processes reading Chrome Login DataEDR file access telemetryBrowser credential theft
Mailbox sign-ins from commercial VPN ranges after a suspected infectionIdentity provider sign-in logsStolen account reuse
Startup folder or Run key entries named as software updatesSysmon Event ID 13, autoruns baselinesMasquerading persistence

Hardening plan

  1. Week 1: confirm every Office installation is on a supported, patched build so the KEV-listed CVEs above are closed; confirm Equation Editor is removed. Load current vendor indicators into protective DNS and mail filtering.
  2. Weeks 2 to 4: block macros in files from the internet by policy (see the Office Macro Blocking Guide) and turn on attack surface reduction rules that block Office child processes, in audit mode for two weeks before enforcing.
  3. Weeks 4 to 8: apply application control to user-writable paths so unsigned or self-signed binaries and side-loaded DLLs cannot run. Pilot on one department, keep the previous policy ready for rollback, and review blocked events daily.
  4. Quarter 1: disable browser password storage on managed devices, remove standard users' local admin rights and enforce phishing-resistant MFA for mail and VPN.
  5. Response: isolate the host, collect scheduled tasks, Run keys, BITS jobs and staging folders, then reimage. Revoke the user's sessions, reset every password saved in the browser and review mailbox sign-ins for the previous 90 days.

Metrics

  • Office builds with all KEV-listed Office CVEs patched: 100%.
  • Equation Editor executions per month: zero.
  • Endpoints with internet macros blocked by policy: 100%.
  • Managed browsers with password saving disabled or controlled: trending to 100%.
  • Time from endpoint alert to user session revocation: under one hour.

Framework mapping

FrameworkReferenceRelevance
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5SI-2 Flaw Remediation, CM-6 Configuration SettingsOffice patching and macro settings
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5SI-3 Malicious Code Protection, SI-4 System MonitoringEmail and endpoint scanning and process monitoring
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5IA-5 Authenticator Management, AT-2 Literacy Training and AwarenessBrowser credential handling and phishing awareness
NIST CSF 2.0PR.AT-01, DE.CM-09, DE.AE-02Awareness, endpoint monitoring, alert analysis
MITRE D3FENDD3-EAL Executable Allowlisting, D3-DNSDL DNS DenylistingBlocking side-loaded binaries and known C2

Practitioner checklist

  • Verify no Office build in the estate is exposed to CVE-2017-11882, CVE-2017-0199, CVE-2017-8570 or older KEV-listed Office flaws.
  • Alert on any EQNEDT32.EXE execution and on Office applications spawning script hosts or bitsadmin.
  • Enforce macro blocking for internet files through policy, not user choice.
  • Hunt for signed executables loading DLLs from user-writable folders.
  • Disable or centrally control browser password storage.
  • Tag external mail and monitor lookalike domains of your organisation and partners.
  • After any infection, revoke sessions and reset browser-saved credentials, not only the Windows password.
  • Record vendor names (Patchwork, Hangover, Dropping Elephant) separately in your intelligence platform.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Threat Actor Groups Guide · Sidewinder Threat Actor Profile Guide · Office Macro Blocking Guide · Phishing Guide · AiTM Phishing Guide

PDF for subscribers

Take this guide with you

Every section, table and checklist in one PDF, with links to the sources and related guides. Subscribe to our weekly NHI & AI Identity Journal and we’ll email you a download link.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 27 October 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org

PDF Downloads for Newsletter Subscribers

Get the guide

Enter your details and we’ll email you a download link.

The full guide is free to read online. The PDF is a thank you for subscribing.

Fill in all fields marked * and tick the PDF box to continue.