Join our Newsletter — 33% off our NHI Course
Home› Guides› Agrius Threat Actor Profile Guide: Iranian Wipers Disguised…
Guide Threat Intelligence & Threat Actors

Agrius Threat Actor Profile Guide: Iranian Wipers Disguised as Ransomware

PDF for newsletter subscribers · free to read online

← All guides
By NHI Mgmt Group, edited by Lalit Choda Updated 27 October 2026 11 min read
On this page

Agrius dresses destruction up as extortion: its victims receive ransom notes, but in many cases the data was wiped and could never have been recovered by paying. This profile covers the Iran-linked group that MITRE ATT&CK tracks as G1030 and Microsoft calls Pink Sandstorm, active since 2020 with an emphasis on Israeli targets. It draws on MITRE ATT&CK v20, SentinelLabs, Check Point Research, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 and Microsoft's threat actor naming table, and follows each source's attribution wording. It is written for incident responders, SOC analysts and infrastructure teams in Israel, the Gulf and any organisation with exposed web servers, and it stays at behaviour level with no malware internals. For wipers as a class, see the Wiper Malware Guide.

Key takeaways

  • The ransom note can be a decoy. SentinelLabs describes Agrius masquerading destructive attacks as ransomware; plan recovery as if no decryptor will ever exist.
  • Exposed web servers are the front door. Every source read describes exploitation of internet-facing web applications followed by ASPXSpy web shell variants.
  • Credentials drive the spread. Unit 42 saw Mimikatz, SAM dumping, SMB password spraying and brute force before lateral movement over RDP.
  • Data theft comes before the wipe. In 2023 Unit 42 saw personal data such as ID numbers and passport scans extracted from databases and exfiltrated before wipers ran.
  • Security tools are attacked directly. Unit 42 recorded attempts to tamper with EDR services and to use vulnerable drivers to kill security processes, so tamper protection and driver blocklists matter.

Who they are (names and aliases)

MITRE ATT&CK describes Agrius as an Iranian threat actor active since 2020, notable for ransomware and wiper operations in the Middle East with an emphasis on Israel, and notes that public reporting links it to Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS). Sources differ in confidence: SentinelLabs (2021) assessed with medium confidence that it is Iranian-affiliated; Check Point (2023) calls it Iran-aligned, says recent reports tie it to MOIS, and adds that its affiliation within Iran is not clear.

NameSourceNotes
Agrius (G1030)MITRE ATT&CK; SentinelLabsSentinelLabs named the group in May 2021
Pink SandstormMicrosoftMicrosoft lists Iran as origin and AMERICIUM, SPECTRAL KITTEN, Agrius, Deadwood, BlackShadow, SharpBoys, FireAnt and Justice Blade as other names
Agonizing SerpensPalo Alto Networks Unit 42Unit 42 also lists DEV-0022
BlackShadowCheck Point; MITREExtortion persona; Check Point calls it the first known alias, used to extort Shirbit

The group runs several extortion and leak personas, so a "new" ransomware brand hitting Israeli organisations may be Agrius under another name. No source read for this page names individuals; this page names none. For the wider Iranian ecosystem, see the Iran State Cyber Operations Guide.

Malware associated in ATT&CK

SoftwareTypeWhat ATT&CK and vendors say
Apostle (S1133)Wiper turned ransomware.NET; began as a wiper and was modified into working ransomware; ransom message suggested a UAE target (SentinelLabs)
IPsec Helper (S1132)Backdoor.NET remote access tool registered as a service; overlaps with Apostle
DEADWOOD (S1134)WiperFirst seen in an unattributed 2019 wiping event in Saudi Arabia, later used in Agrius operations
Moneybird (S1137)RansomwareC++, built for targeted use; reported by Check Point in May 2023
MultiLayer Wiper (S1135); BFG Agonizer (S1136)WipersUsed in the 2023 campaign against Israeli education and technology organisations (Unit 42)
ASPXSpy (S0073)Web shellCustom variants used for initial foothold across campaigns

Targeting and motivation

  • Geography: primarily Israel, with victims in the wider Middle East including the UAE (SentinelLabs). Unit 42 saw no non-Israeli victims in its 2023 telemetry.
  • Sectors: Unit 42's 2023 campaign hit higher education and technology. Check Point cites earlier attacks on the insurer Shirbit and on Bar Ilan University.
  • Motivation: disruption, data theft and psychological pressure in a state context rather than profit. SentinelLabs describes an evolution from espionage to destructive attacks presented as ransomware.
  • Leaks: stolen data is published through extortion personas, adding reputational and privacy harm. See the Hack and Leak Operations Guide.
  • Who should care: Israeli organisations and their suppliers above all, but any organisation running public IIS or ASP.NET applications faces the same entry technique.

Tactics and techniques (MITRE ATT&CK)

All IDs below are ATT&CK v20 techniques recorded against G1030, except where marked as NHI Mgmt Group mapping of a vendor description.

TacticTechniqueWhat sources describePrimary defence
Initial accessT1190 Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationVulnerable internet-facing web servers; access often via ProtonVPN nodesPatch and WAF public apps; remove unused ones
PersistenceT1505.003 Web ShellASPXSpy variants, hidden in text files disguised as certificates (Check Point)File integrity monitoring on web roots
DiscoveryT1046 Network Service Discovery; T1018 Remote System DiscoveryPublic scanners such as NBTscan and SoftPerfectAlert on internal scanning from web servers
Credential accessT1003.001 LSASS Memory; T1003.002 Security Account ManagerMimikatz, ProcDump, SAM dumpingCredential Guard, LSA protection, ASR rule for LSASS
Credential accessT1110.003 Password Spraying; T1110 Brute ForceSMB spraying and brute forceLockout policy; alert on failed SMB logons
Lateral movementT1021.001 Remote Desktop Protocol; T1078.002 Domain AccountsManual RDP, tunnelled through web shells and PlinkBlock RDP from DMZ servers; tiered admin accounts
PersistenceT1543.003 Windows ServiceIPsec Helper installed as a serviceAlert on new services (Event ID 7045)
Collection and exfiltrationT1005 Data from Local System; T1560.001 Archive via Utility; T1041 Exfiltration Over C2 ChannelDatabase extraction, 7-Zip archives, WinSCP and pscp transferDatabase activity monitoring; egress controls
Defence impairmentT1685 Disable or Modify ToolsEDR service tampering and vulnerable driver loadersTamper protection; vulnerable driver blocklist
Defence impairment (NHIMG mapping)T1685.005 Clear Windows Event LogsMultiLayer wiper clears event logs (Unit 42)Forward logs off-host in real time
Impact (NHIMG mapping)T1485 Data Destruction; T1561.002 Disk Structure Wipe; T1490 Inhibit System Recovery; T1486 Data Encrypted for ImpactFile wiping, boot sector overwrite, shadow copy deletion; Apostle and Moneybird encryptionOffline, immutable backups with tested restores

How they abuse identities and credentials

  • Web server identities: a web shell runs as the application pool identity. If that identity is a domain account or has rights beyond the site, the foothold becomes a domain foothold. Run IIS application pools under virtual accounts or gMSAs with no interactive logon rights. See the Group Managed Service Accounts (gMSA) Guide.
  • Cached and local credentials: LSASS and SAM dumping yields local administrator hashes. A shared local admin password across servers turns one dump into many hosts; use Windows LAPS.
  • Spraying against SMB: weak or reused passwords on domain accounts let the group expand without exploits. Smart lockout, banned password lists and alerting on Event ID 4625 bursts matter.
  • Domain accounts over RDP: ATT&CK records use of valid domain accounts. Admins logging in to DMZ web servers with domain admin rights leave exactly the credentials the group harvests.
  • Cloud admin accounts: not documented for Agrius in the sources read, but the Stryker Intune wiper attack, claimed by the Handala persona that the US Justice Department says is run by MOIS, shows a single hijacked admin account being used to wipe devices at scale. It is not attributed to Agrius.

Notable incidents

DateEventSource
2020Agrius observed operating in Israel; Shirbit extortion under the BlackShadow personaSentinelLabs; Check Point
May 2021SentinelLabs names Agrius and documents Apostle's shift from wiper to ransomware, DEADWOOD and IPsec HelperSentinelLabs
2023 (reported May)Moneybird ransomware used against Israeli organisations; data leaked through a known aliasCheck Point
January to October 2023Campaign against Israeli higher education and technology: data theft then MultiLayer, PartialWasher and BFG Agonizer wipersUnit 42

Unit 42 linked the 2023 activity to the group with high confidence based on code overlaps with Apostle, Fantasy and IPsec Helper, reused web shell code and the destructive pattern. No law enforcement takedown or indictment of Agrius is recorded in the sources read.

Detection and defence

What to monitor

SignalData sourceWhy it matters
New or changed .aspx files, or text files renamed to .aspx, in web rootsFile integrity monitoring; EDR file eventsASPXSpy variants were staged as disguised files
w3wp.exe spawning cmd.exe, PowerShell or scannersEDR; Sysmon Event ID 1Classic web shell behaviour
Access to LSASS or SAM hive copiesEDR; Sysmon Event ID 10; ASR audit eventsCredential dumping precedes spread
Bursts of failed SMB logons from one internal hostSecurity Event IDs 4625 and 4771Password spraying and brute force
New services and vulnerable driver loadsEvent ID 7045; Sysmon Event ID 6Backdoor persistence and EDR killing
Large archive creation and outbound SCP or SFTP from serversEDR; NetFlow; firewallExfiltration before destruction
Inbound sessions to web apps from commercial VPN exit nodesWAF and web logs enriched with IP intelligenceSources describe ProtonVPN use

Phased response plan

  1. Shrink the web attack surface: inventory internet-facing IIS and other web apps, remove the unused, patch KEV-listed flaws first and put the rest behind a WAF. See the Microsoft Exchange Server Security Guide where Exchange is exposed.
  2. Contain the web tier: block outbound RDP, SMB and SSH from DMZ web servers to internal networks and run application pools under least-privilege identities. Test in a staging copy and keep the previous firewall rules for rollback.
  3. Protect credentials: enable Credential Guard and LSA protection, deploy Windows LAPS and switch on the ASR rule that blocks credential stealing from LSASS, in audit mode first.
  4. Protect the defenders: enable EDR tamper protection and the Microsoft vulnerable driver blocklist. See the Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver and EDR Killers Guide.
  5. Make wipes survivable: keep immutable or offline backups with separate credentials and rehearse a full domain and server restore. See the Backup Security and Immutable Backup Guide.
  6. Prepare the decision: agree in advance that Israeli-targeted "ransomware" from unknown brands is handled as a possible wiper, so teams restore rather than wait on negotiations. See the Wiper Attack Response Playbook.

Decision guidance

  • Pay or restore: with Agrius-style operations, payment buys nothing if the data was wiped. Treat restore capability as the only reliable recovery path and involve national CERTs early.
  • Small organisations: move public websites to managed hosting outside the corporate domain, enforce MFA on remote access and keep an offline backup. That removes most of the documented chain.
  • Large organisations: add web shell hunting, database activity monitoring for bulk PII extraction, and EDR coverage with tamper protection on every web server.

Metrics

  • Number of internet-facing web apps with an unpatched KEV-listed flaw (target zero).
  • Percentage of web servers with file integrity monitoring on web roots.
  • Percentage of servers with Credential Guard or LSA protection enabled.
  • Percentage of EDR agents with tamper protection on.
  • Time to restore a representative server and a domain controller from offline backup, measured in exercises.

Framework mapping

Control areaNIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5NIST CSF 2.0
Patch public-facing applicationsSI-2, RA-5ID.RA-01, PR.PS-02
Segment DMZ from internal networkSC-7, AC-4PR.IR-01
Least privilege for service identitiesAC-6, IA-5PR.AA-05
Integrity monitoring and EDRSI-7, SI-4DE.CM-09
Backups and recoveryCP-9, CP-10PR.DS-11, RC.RP-01
Incident handlingIR-4RS.MA-01

Common failure patterns

  • Waiting for a decryptor: treating the note at face value delays restore while nothing can be recovered.
  • Web servers joined to the domain with broad rights: a web shell inherits a path straight to domain accounts.
  • Shared local admin passwords: one SAM dump unlocks the estate.
  • Backups reachable with domain credentials: wipers and operators destroy what they can reach.
  • Logs kept only on the host: the wiper clears event logs, taking the evidence with it.

Practitioner checklist

  • Inventory and patch all internet-facing web applications; remove those not needed.
  • Monitor web roots for new or renamed .aspx files and w3wp.exe child processes.
  • Block outbound RDP, SMB and SSH from DMZ servers to internal networks.
  • Run application pools under least-privilege virtual accounts or gMSAs.
  • Deploy Windows LAPS, Credential Guard and the LSASS ASR rule.
  • Enable EDR tamper protection and the vulnerable driver blocklist.
  • Forward Windows event logs off-host in real time.
  • Keep immutable or offline backups with separate credentials and test restores.
  • Pre-agree a wiper-first response for unexplained ransomware brands.

Standards and references

Related NHI Mgmt Group resources: Wiper Malware Guide · Iran State Cyber Operations Guide · MuddyWater Threat Actor Profile · APT33 Threat Actor Profile Guide · Wiper Attack Response Playbook

PDF for subscribers

Take this guide with you

Every section, table and checklist in one PDF, with links to the sources and related guides. Subscribe to our weekly NHI & AI Identity Journal and we’ll email you a download link.

Free weekly newsletter

Subscribe to the NHI & AI Identity Journal

The latest on NHI and Agentic AI security – articles, research, breaches, news and events every week.

Bonus 33% off our NHI Course when you subscribe.

NHIMG Editorial Note
Researched and written by the NHI Mgmt Group editorial team using AI tools, under the editorial direction of Lalit Choda. Facts are drawn from the sources listed on this page and checked by our automated quality process. Last updated 27 October 2026. Spotted an error? Use our contact page.
NHI Mgmt Group, the independent authority on Non-Human Identity, IAM and Agentic AI security. nhimg.org

PDF Downloads for Newsletter Subscribers

Get the guide

Enter your details and we’ll email you a download link.

The full guide is free to read online. The PDF is a thank you for subscribing.

Fill in all fields marked * and tick the PDF box to continue.