Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
11/07/2026 8:24 pm
TL;DR: Outages now cost businesses a median of $33,333 per minute, average 196 minutes in duration, and leave only 20% of organizations fully prepared for recovery, according to Secureframe’s compilation of disaster recovery statistics. The data shows resilience is still too often treated as a compliance exercise rather than an operational control problem.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Secureframe: The Disaster Recovery Gap and the statistics revealing why most organisations are not prepared
By the numbers:
- Outages last 196 minutes, or more than three hours, on average across all industries and company sizes.
- Only 20% of organizations describe themselves as fully prepared for outages.
- Organizations with automated incident response resolve incidents 78 minutes faster and experience 45% lower annual outage costs.
Questions worth separating out
Q: What fails when disaster recovery plans exist but restore access is not governed?
A: Recovery fails when the organisation has backups but lacks controlled access to restore them.
Q: When should organisations prioritise restore testing over adding more backup coverage?
A: Organisations should prioritise restore testing whenever backup coverage looks healthy but business recovery remains slow or uncertain.
Q: What do teams get wrong about automating cloud incident response?
A: They often automate the wrong layer first.
Practitioner guidance
- Map recovery access as a privileged identity set Inventory every human and non-human identity that can restore backups, flip failover, or approve emergency access.
- Test restoreability, not just backup existence Run recovery exercises that measure time to restore critical SaaS data, infrastructure state, and authentication dependencies.
- Constrain emergency access with time-bound approvals Use just-in-time access for recovery operators and define explicit approval paths for break-glass use.
What's in the full article
Secureframe's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- The full statistics set behind outage costs, recovery times, and downtime frequency across industries.
- Specific references to recovery planning, SaaS backup, and operational resilience findings that support board reporting.
- The article’s broader disaster recovery checklist and template-oriented guidance for teams building a formal programme.
- The source’s own analysis of how automation changes incident response economics and where manual work remains the bottleneck.
👉 Read Secureframe’s disaster recovery statistics and resilience analysis →
Disaster recovery gaps: what practitioners need to fix now?
Explore further
11/07/2026 8:54 pm
Resilience programmes still treat recovery as a technology problem when it is also an identity governance problem. Backup success does not equal recovery success if the identities needed to restore systems are over-privileged, undocumented, or unavailable when the primary environment fails. That gap matters for both human and non-human identities because recovery operations often depend on privileged service accounts, admin roles, and break-glass paths that are rarely exercised in normal operations. Practitioners should manage recovery access as a governed control surface, not an emergency afterthought.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who is accountable when recovery workflows fail during an outage?
A: Accountability should sit with the teams that own application configuration, cloud platform controls, and identity governance together, because rebuild failure usually crosses all three domains. If service identities, privileged automation, and recovery permissions are not defined before the outage, no single team can restore the service cleanly.
👉 Read our full editorial: Disaster recovery gaps are turning outages into business losses
