Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
01/08/2026 10:49 pm
TL;DR: MDR buyers now prioritise documented decisions, hybrid AI-plus-human workflows, stack compatibility, and investigations that complete in minutes, not hours, according to Airmdr’s survey of 260 security leaders, with 85% saying they trust providers more when every decision is documented. The market is moving from outcome claims to evidence-backed operations, and that changes how teams evaluate autonomy, auditability, and integration.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Airmdr: MDR Buying in 2025 - What Buyers Demand and Why
By the numbers:
- 85% say they’re more likely to trust an MDR provider when every decision is documented.
- 77% want MDR that works with the tools they already own
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams evaluate AI-augmented MDR services?
A: They should evaluate them on validated outcomes, not on how much activity the provider automates.
Q: Why do documented investigations matter so much in MDR buying decisions?
A: Documented investigations turn claims into evidence.
Q: What breaks when an MDR service cannot integrate with the existing stack?
A: You lose context, consistency, and operational trust.
Practitioner guidance
- Define evidence requirements in the RFP Require timestamped case logs, enrichment sources, approval history, and exportable evidence for a representative investigation.
- Test the hybrid operating model Ask the provider to show where AI can auto-resolve, where humans must approve, and how exceptions are escalated.
- Verify stack-safe orchestration Check that MDR integrations work with your current ticketing, collaboration, and telemetry systems without forcing replacement.
What's in the full report
Airmdr's full research report covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- The full survey breakdown across 260 security leaders, including how MDR buying criteria vary by organization size and sector.
- Sample RFP prompts and evaluation checkpoints for case logs, approvals, and evidence exports.
- Additional detail on hybrid AI-human workflows, including how buyers judge escalation, review, and governed autonomy.
- More context on the buying-stage metrics that separate promising claims from operationally measurable service delivery.
👉 Read Airmdr's research report on MDR buying in 2025 →
MDR buying in 2025: what buyers now expect from providers?
Explore further
01/08/2026 10:57 pm
Auditability is becoming the buyer’s real control requirement. MDR has moved beyond alert handling into evidence production, and that changes how security leaders should evaluate the service. If a provider cannot show the decision path, then the organization cannot defend the outcome to auditors, executives, or incident reviewers. The practical conclusion is that documented reasoning is now part of the control, not an optional reporting layer.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own governance when AI-assisted MDR actions affect production systems?
A: Ownership should sit with the security function that can define approval thresholds, exception handling, and audit expectations. The vendor may execute the workflow, but the buyer remains accountable for the impact. That is why governance, logging, and review rights need to be explicit before automation is allowed to touch production.
👉 Read our full editorial: MDR buying in 2025 is shifting toward proof, speed, and auditability
