Post-quantum encryption adoption: what practitioners need to act on

TL;DR: Post-quantum encryption is still mostly in assessment and pilot stages, according to Fortanix, even as NIST-selected algorithms and store-now-decrypt-later risk push long-term confidentiality onto the agenda. Crypto inventory, data longevity classification, and hybrid approaches are now the practical bridge to cryptographic agility.

Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Fortanix: “Is Post-Quantum Encryption Widely Adopted Yet?”.

Key questions

Q: How should security teams start a post-quantum migration program?

A: Start by inventorying where cryptography is actually used, then measure external exposure first.

Q: Why does post-quantum cryptography create risk even before quantum computers are practical?

A: Because adversaries can harvest encrypted data now and decrypt it later if future quantum capability becomes available.

Q: How do organisations know if they are ready for post-quantum migration?

A: They are ready when they can identify every place a classic algorithm is in use, change it without major downtime, and prove ownership for each trust domain.

Practitioner guidance

• Build a complete cryptographic inventory Map every use of RSA, ECC, signatures, key exchange, certificates, and token trust across applications, cloud services, devices, and third parties.
• Classify data by confidentiality lifespan Prioritise records, identity artefacts, and regulated datasets that must remain secret for years or decades, not just months.
• Test hybrid cryptographic paths in non-production first Measure compatibility, latency, and key size effects before extending post-quantum algorithms into production trust chains and federation flows.

Bottom line: Post-quantum migration is still early, but the risk is already real for data and identity trust that must remain confidential over a long horizon.

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →  |  Our Services →  |  Read the full analysis →