Pre-transaction crypto compliance: what it means for financial teams

TL;DR: Treasury’s GENIUS Act report correctly identifies digital-asset illicit finance as a growing threat, according to Blockaid, but still centres investigation over prevention even as it cites $5.8B in crypto scam losses, $2.8B stolen by DPRK actors, and 3.8 billion monthly transactions. The practical shift is toward pre-transaction interdiction, behavioural detection, and wallet-layer controls before settlement.

Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Blockaid: “What the U.S. Treasury's Illicit Finance Report Means for Onchain Security”.

By the numbers:

• $2.8B was stolen by DPRK cybercriminals in just 21 months.
• 3.8 billion monthly transactions were recorded as of early 2025, up 96% year-over-year.

Key questions

Q: What should financial teams do first when onchain compliance still depends on post-transaction review?

A: Start by moving risk checks upstream of settlement.

Q: Why do sanctions screens miss many crypto threats that behavioural detection can catch?

A: Sanctions screens depend on known addresses and entities, while modern attackers can generate new wallets and change infrastructure quickly.

Q: What breaks when transaction risk controls sit after settlement?

A: The institution loses the ability to influence the transfer itself and is reduced to evidence collection.

Practitioner guidance

• Implement pre-transaction decision points Place risk evaluation before signing, routing, or settlement in wallets, dApps, and payment workflows so suspicious transfers can be blocked in time.
• Separate screening from behavioural detection Run sanctions and known-entity screening alongside behavioural models that look for wallet sequencing, contract traits, and suspicious interaction patterns.
• Govern wallet and dApp integrations as control surfaces Review external integrations for override rules, audit logging, model inputs, and escalation paths because they now shape enforcement decisions.

Bottom line: Crypto compliance is moving from post-hoc tracing toward prevention at the point of transaction.

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →  |  Our Services →  |  Read the full analysis →