Secure data sharing: what controls do teams still miss?

TL;DR: Secure data sharing fails when organisations rely on encryption alone, because data can still be over-shared, decrypted without need, retained in downstream systems, or exposed across vendors, regions, and AI workflows, according to Protecto. The governance problem is lifecycle control, not transport protection.

Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Protecto: “Secure Data Sharing: Best Practices for Privacy and Compliance”.

By the numbers:

• The global average cost of a data breach is $4.9 million, according to IBM’s 2026 Cost of a Data Breach Report mentioned by Protecto.

Key questions

Q: What breaks when organisations rely on encryption alone to protect PII?

A: Encryption protects data at rest and in transit, but it does not stop authorised users from oversharing, copying, or leaking information inside active applications.

Q: When should organisations prioritise tokenisation over raw-data sharing?

A: Prioritise tokenisation when a partner, application, or workflow needs data utility but does not need the original sensitive value.

Practitioner guidance

• Classify shared datasets before transfer Identify whether the data contains PII, PHI, PCI, confidential business information, or regulated records before any file, API call, or export is approved.
• Minimise fields to the stated purpose Share only the attributes the recipient needs, and remove names, full contact details, and account identifiers whenever the use case can tolerate less.
• Apply tokenisation for reusable identifiers Use tokenisation when the recipient needs matching or analytics but does not need raw sensitive values, and restrict detokenisation to tightly governed workflows.

Bottom line: Secure data sharing fails when organisations stop at encryption and ignore what recipients can do after decryption.

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →  |  Our Services →  |  Read the full analysis →