TL;DR: Threat hunting is shifting from enterprise-only work to a practical security operation for SMBs and MSPs, according to Todyl, because proactive investigation can expose credential abuse, privilege escalation, lateral movement and stealthy persistence before alerts trigger. Visibility and hypothesis-driven investigation now matter as much as tooling.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Todyl: “What Is Threat Hunting? A Practical Guide for MSPs and SMBs”.
Key questions
Q: How should SOC teams build a threat hunting programme instead of isolated hunts?
A: Start with coverage analysis, not with the news cycle.
Q: Why does threat hunting matter when organisations already have EDR and SIEM?
A: Because tools detect what they have been taught to detect, while attackers often blend into normal behaviour.
Q: What do security teams get wrong about threat hunting at scale?
A: They often treat hunting as a query-writing problem instead of a workflow design problem.
Practitioner guidance
- Define hunt hypotheses around identity abuse Start with questions about compromised accounts, unusual admin use, persistence and suspicious remote access rather than generic malicious activity.
- Centralise the telemetry needed for correlation Bring identity, endpoint, cloud and network logs into one searchable workflow so investigators can pivot from login anomalies to privilege use and later movement without switching tools.
- Use hunts to validate detection coverage After each hunt, record which behaviours were visible, which were missed and which need new detections or tuning.
Bottom line: Threat hunting is most valuable when it is aimed at hidden compromise paths such as credential abuse, privilege escalation and persistence, not just at known malware signatures.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →