Transaction screening and instant payments: are your controls keeping up?

TL;DR: Instant payments and volatile sanctions lists are forcing transaction screening to operate as a real-time control rather than a back-office review, according to Feedzai, with US authorities issuing $940 million in AML and sanctions penalties in 2025. Legacy matching and manual updates cannot keep pace with millisecond settlement windows, so governance now depends on speed, explainability, and audit-ready decisioning.

Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Feedzai: “Transaction Screening: A Complete Guide for Financial Institutions”.

By the numbers:

• US authorities issued $940 million in AML and sanctions violation penalties in 2025.
• The Faster Payments Council anticipates that between 70 and 80% of all US institutions will be receiving instant payments by 2028.
• The Faster Payments Council says that 30-40% of all financial institutions will be able to send instant payments.

Key questions

Q: What breaks when transaction screening cannot keep pace with instant payments?

A: The control stops being preventive and becomes reactive.

Q: Why do real-time sanctions controls need faster list updates than legacy AML workflows?

A: Because sanctions environments change faster than batch processes can absorb.

Q: How can teams tell whether transaction screening is actually working?

A: Look for low false-positive rates, rapid list refresh, consistent audit trails, and a clear distinction between blocked, frozen, and approved transactions.

Practitioner guidance

• Define the screening decision boundary before settlement Map exactly when a payment can be approved, flagged, frozen, or rejected so the control acts before funds move, not after review closes.
• Shorten sanctions list update cycles Replace manual download and transformation steps with automated ingestion and validation so list changes are applied in hours, not business days.
• Re-tune matching to reduce false positives Move beyond rigid name matching and use multi-attribute scoring for names, jurisdictions, addresses, and contextual fields.

Bottom line: Transaction screening is moving from a back-office AML check to a real-time control embedded in payment execution.

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →  |  Our Services →  |  Read the full analysis →