Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 5:15 pm
TL;DR: Static vaults and session-only controls are no longer enough for cloud-native PAM, because modern access now spans humans, workloads, and automation that need ephemeral credentials, unified secrets handling, and tighter control over standing privilege, according to Akeyless. The architectural split matters because identity programmes built for stored secrets struggle to scale cleanly across hybrid infrastructure and machine identity.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Akeyless: Akeyless vs Keeper comparison for modern privileged access management
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams replace standing privileged access in cloud-native environments?
A: Security teams should replace standing privilege with short-lived access that is issued only when a task begins and revoked as soon as the task ends.
Q: Why do machine identities complicate traditional PAM programmes?
A: Machine identities complicate traditional PAM because they need access patterns that are automated, frequent, and often cross-cloud.
Q: What breaks when privileged access still depends on stored credentials?
A: Stored credentials create a standing exposure window that survives longer than the access need itself.
Practitioner guidance
- Map every standing secret in privileged workflows Identify where passwords, API keys, configuration files, and long-lived tokens still support human or machine access.
- Separate human session control from machine credential governance Review whether the same access pattern is being applied to admins, service accounts, and automation.
- Replace copied automation secrets with workload-native identity Target pipelines, orchestration tools, and container workloads that still depend on copied credentials.
What's in the full article
Akeyless' full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Architecture-level feature comparisons between vault-based PAM and dynamic, on-demand credential issuance
- Implementation detail on how unified secrets, KMS, and certificate lifecycle management are positioned in the platform model
- Specific workflow examples for cloud, DevOps, and machine identity access that buyers may need when evaluating deployment fit
- The vendor's own explanation of deployment overhead, gateway use, and scaling assumptions
👉 Read Akeyless's comparison of dynamic PAM and vault-based access models →
Akeyless vs Keeper: what does dynamic PAM change for IAM?
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services →
25/06/2026 5:49 pm
Dynamic credential issuance is the right control model for modern privileged access. When access is issued on demand and expires automatically, the programme removes the largest operational weakness in legacy PAM: durable credentials that outlive the task they were meant to support. That matters across humans and machines because the risk is no longer only misuse, but persistence. The practitioner conclusion is simple: PAM should be judged by whether it eliminates standing privilege, not by whether it can hide a password behind a session.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 54% of organisations are dissatisfied with their current secrets management solution because not all secrets are secured, and 43% cite lack of central management, according to The 2024 State of Secrets Management Survey.
- 88.5% of organisations acknowledge that their non-human IAM practices lag behind or are merely on par with their human identity and access management efforts, according to The 2024 Non-Human Identity Security Report.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Should organisations prioritise JIT access over vault expansion?
A: Yes, if the access pattern can be issued dynamically without keeping a reusable secret in circulation. JIT reduces the time a credential exists, while vault expansion mostly centralises custody of credentials that still need to live somewhere. For teams trying to reduce blast radius, the more important question is whether standing privilege can be removed entirely.
👉 Read our full editorial: Akeyless vs Keeper: what dynamic PAM changes for identity teams
