Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
12/06/2026 10:07 pm
TL;DR: Credential management fails when organisations treat authentication as a method problem rather than an end-to-end system problem, because help desk load, user friction, and lifecycle sprawl all shape security outcomes, according to Axiad. The practical issue is not stronger controls in isolation, but whether identity processes can scale without creating new exposure.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Axiad: Best Practices for Streamlining Credential Management
By the numbers:
- Around 40% of a help desk’s time is spent just resetting passwords.
- End users spend over 12 minutes per week just finding and resetting passwords.
- Consumers are on average spending 12 full days of their lives searching for and resetting usernames and passwords.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams manage credential lifecycle processes at scale?
A: Security teams should manage credential lifecycle processes as governed workflows, not ticket-by-ticket exceptions.
Q: Why do authentication programmes fail when they focus only on methods?
A: Authentication programmes fail when they focus only on methods because the control only works if the surrounding system can support it.
Q: How can organisations reduce the risk of legacy self-service recovery?
A: Organisations can reduce risk by reviewing whether recovery flows rely on interceptable factors such as OTPs and then replacing them with phishing-resistant options.
Practitioner guidance
- Map authentication methods by population Break down authentication methods by user group, privilege tier, and application family so you can see where non-MFA exposure is concentrated and where policy drift is hiding.
- Redesign recovery paths to remove interceptable steps Review self-service recovery flows that rely on OTPs or other easily intercepted factors, and replace them with methods that reduce phishing and man-in-the-middle exposure.
- Treat lifecycle steps as governed workflows Document who owns enrollment, renewal, replacement, expiration, and offboarding for credentials and authenticators, then automate only after each step has a clear control objective.
What's in the full article
Axiad's full blog post covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- A step-by-step explanation of how Axiad structures credential and authenticator management across the lifecycle.
- Specific examples of how actionable visibility can be used to identify weaker authentication methods by group.
- The implementation logic behind automated workflows and self-service recovery in large identity environments.
- A closer look at group-based management for credential resets, authenticator replacement, and lifecycle exceptions.
👉 Read Axiad's analysis of credential management and authentication lifecycle control →
Credential management and lifecycle gaps: what IAM teams keep missing?
Explore further
13/06/2026 12:41 am
Credential management is an identity governance problem, not a point control. The article’s central claim is that authentication security depends on how users, authenticators, and credentials are managed across their lifecycle. That aligns with NIST Cybersecurity Framework thinking, where identity protection is an operational discipline rather than a one-time configuration. The practitioner conclusion is simple: if lifecycle ownership is weak, authentication policy will fail in practice.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 96% of organisations store secrets outside of secrets managers in vulnerable locations including code, config files, and CI/CD tools, according to Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
- Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts, according to Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own authentication visibility and remediation decisions?
A: Identity and security teams should own authentication visibility and remediation decisions together, because the data is only useful when it drives policy changes. Visibility should show which groups use weaker methods, where exceptions are accumulating, and which populations should be remediated first. That is how policy becomes enforceable.
👉 Read our full editorial: Credential management is the system problem behind stronger authentication
