Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
25/06/2026 12:25 am
TL;DR: Shared platform services can unify audit data, lifecycle processing, correlation, policy enforcement, automation, and visibility across human and machine identities, including AI agents, according to Delinea. The governance lesson is that identity programmes gain more from consistent control planes than from isolated product features, especially when lifecycle, logging, and policy must span multiple actor types.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Delinea: Part 2: How the Delinea platform delivers value beyond security
By the numbers:
- Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts.
- 90% of IT leaders say properly managing NHIs is essential for a successful zero-trust implementation.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should teams govern identities when access is managed through a shared platform?
A: Teams should govern the shared services first, then the products that consume them.
Q: Why do service accounts and AI agents need the same lifecycle discipline as human users?
A: Because the governance risk is the same: access outlives the business state that justified it.
Q: What breaks when audit data is split across multiple identity tools?
A: Compliance teams lose a consistent source of truth.
Practitioner guidance
- Map shared services before mapping products Inventory which controls are centralized today, then identify where audit, lifecycle, policy, and correlation still live inside individual tools.
- Tie JML events to every non-human identity system Confirm that provisioning and deprovisioning signals from systems of record reach service accounts, API keys, certificates, and AI-driven integrations.
- Test whether one policy model spans all actor types Validate that the same access rules can govern human users, service accounts, workloads, and AI agents without separate exception paths.
What's in the full article
Delinea's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- How the platform's centralized audit pipeline is structured across Secret Server, Privilege Manager, and Privilege Control for Servers
- How JML signals flow into lifecycle modelling and how connected systems consume those events through APIs
- How event correlation links privileged credential use, session activity, and anomaly detection into one investigation trail
- How shared policy enforcement and automation are applied across human, machine, cloud-native, and AI identities
👉 Read Delinea's blog on shared identity services across security and operations →
Delinea platform shared services: what it means for IAM teams?
Explore further
25/06/2026 9:20 am
Shared services are becoming the real identity control plane. The article shows that logging, lifecycle, policy, correlation, and automation are no longer separate operational conveniences. They are the mechanisms that determine whether identity governance is consistent or fragmented across products. The practical conclusion is that platform architecture now matters as much as individual controls.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 91.6% of secrets remain valid five days after the targeted organisation is notified, showing a critical gap in remediation procedures, according to Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
- Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How can identity teams tell whether their platform is really delivering governance value?
A: Look for one policy layer, one lifecycle model, and one evidence trail across identity types. If teams still duplicate rules, manually reconcile logs, or manage offboarding separately in each product, the platform is reducing complexity only at the surface.
👉 Read our full editorial: Delinea platform shared services reshape identity governance
