Topic starter
08/07/2026 7:00 pm
TL;DR: Privileged access management is framed as the control layer that governs who can reach critical systems, when they can do it, and what they can change, with session recording, JIT access, and credential rotation positioned as the main safeguards, according to Securden. The deeper issue is that PAM only works when privilege is still centralised, visible, and short-lived enough to govern.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Securden: “Top 10 Privileged Access Management Use Cases for Enhanced Security”.
By the numbers:
- Cybercrime is predicted to cost businesses USD 10.5 trillion annually by 2025, with costs growing 15% each year.
- Cybercrime is predicted to cost businesses USD 10.5 trillion annually by 2025, with costs growing 15% each year.
Key questions
Q: What breaks when privileged access is not continuously governed?
A: When privileged access is not continuously governed, standing privilege persists, dormant accounts remain usable, and the attack surface expands across human and machine identities.
Q: When should organisations prioritise just-in-time admin access over permanent privilege?
A: Organisations should prioritise just-in-time admin access when elevated rights are not needed continuously and when compromise of standing privilege would create unacceptable blast radius.
Q: What are the signs that privileged access processes are breaking down in practice?
A: Common warning signs include password hunting by email or phone, credentials stored in spreadsheets or sticky notes, shared accounts that nobody fully owns, and ad hoc access requests that consume excessive time.
Practitioner guidance
- Inventory all privileged accounts Map every interactive admin, service, vendor, and emergency account before deciding where PAM controls actually need to sit.
- Convert standing privilege to JIT Use just-in-time access for tasks that do not require permanent elevation, especially where access is predictable and time-bound.
- Vault and rotate privileged credentials Store administrative secrets centrally and rotate them on a schedule that matches the risk of reuse, leakage, and offboarding delay.
Bottom line: PAM remains a necessary control, but it still breaks down when privilege is distributed across remote work, cloud systems, vendors, and service accounts.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
08/07/2026 7:23 pm
PAM fails first when privilege is still treated as a stable state. The article shows a control model built around centralisation, logging, and revocation, but those assumptions only hold when access remains visible long enough to govern. Once privilege is shared, distributed, or embedded in cloud and vendor workflows, the governance surface is wider than the vault.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should teams respond when a privileged account is suspected of misuse?
A: Contain the account first by removing access, reviewing recent authentication trails and checking for other identities that share the same privileges or trust relationships. Privileged accounts can amplify one compromise into broad access, so containment has to focus on the blast radius, not just the single login event. Offboarding and revalidation should follow immediately.
👉 Read our full editorial: PAM use cases show where privileged access controls still break down