Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
02/08/2026 12:18 pm
TL;DR: Weak authentication, stolen credentials, and lateral movement remain the main failure points in perimeter-era security, according to Yoti. Zero Trust shifts the control point to verified identity, but the governance challenge is whether organisations can prove who is accessing systems before trust is extended.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Yoti: Zero Trust identity controls and verified authentication
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams implement Zero Trust for non-human identities?
A: Start by inventorying every machine identity, assigning an owner, and mapping its access to a specific business function.
Q: Why do valid credentials still create so much risk in zero trust environments?
A: Because a credential can be valid and still be unsafe if it has more privilege than the current task requires.
Q: What do security teams get wrong about passwordless authentication?
A: The most common mistake is treating passwordless as a user-experience upgrade instead of an identity control change.
Practitioner guidance
- Map high-risk access paths to identity-first controls Identify applications, admin consoles, and customer journeys where network trust still substitutes for strong identity verification.
- Prioritise passwordless rollout where phishing risk is highest Start with privileged users, remote workers, and customer flows that are repeatedly targeted through credential theft.
- Treat biometric checks as an impersonation control Use liveness detection and secure capture to reduce replay, screenshot, and deepfake abuse.
What's in the full article
Yoti's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- How the digital ID flow supports reusable authentication across employee and customer journeys
- How biometric checks and liveness detection are positioned to reduce impersonation risk
- How passwordless login is described as a practical alternative to password-based access
- How the platform fits into SaaS integrations and SDK-based deployment patterns
👉 Read Yoti's analysis of Zero Trust identity controls and verified authentication →
Zero trust identity controls: what it means for IAM teams?
Explore further
02/08/2026 1:19 pm
Zero Trust is an identity governance model, not a network slogan. The article correctly frames the real problem as trust collapse at the point of access, where identity is the only durable control plane. For IAM practitioners, that means the policy question is not where the user sits, but whether the system can prove who or what is requesting access right now. The practical conclusion is that access governance must follow identity proof, not network location.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How can security teams know whether identity controls are actually reducing breach impact?
A: Look for evidence that suspicious accounts are contained fast, active sessions are terminated, and privileged access is limited to the smallest possible set of systems. If a compromised account can still reach sensitive resources after detection, the controls are not working well enough to limit impact.
👉 Read our full editorial: Zero trust identity controls are now foundational for access security
