Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
24/06/2026 11:02 pm
TL;DR: APAC revenues tripled in 2018 as it expanded staff, offices, partnerships, and cloud identity governance capabilities aimed at faster deployment and broader access control coverage, according to Saviynt. The signal for practitioners is that identity programmes are being judged on speed, scale, and integration depth, not just policy intent.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Saviynt: APAC growth, staffing expansion, and identity governance platform updates
By the numbers:
- Saviynt says it tripled revenues in 2018 in APAC.
- Saviynt says it doubled its employee count in 2018.
- Saviynt received $40 million in series A funding from Carrick Capital Partners.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should IAM teams prioritise identity governance deployment?
A: Start with the systems that concentrate the most access risk and business impact, then expand coverage once certification, policy enforcement, and exception handling are working in production.
Q: Why do identity governance programmes fail when integrations are too narrow?
A: They fail because governance cannot control what it cannot see.
Q: How do security teams know whether identity governance is reducing risk?
A: Look for shorter time from access change to visibility, fewer unmanaged entitlements, and faster completion of review and remediation cycles.
Practitioner guidance
- Map governance coverage to business-critical applications first Start with the systems where access decisions create the highest operational or compliance risk, then expand coverage to lower-risk platforms only after certification and policy enforcement are functioning.
- Measure implementation speed as a governance control Track how long it takes to move from project approval to live entitlement review, access certification, and exception handling.
- Prioritise connector coverage across cloud and enterprise estates Verify that governance tools can see and control access across SaaS, ERP, infrastructure, and collaboration platforms, not just one identity domain.
What's in the full analysis
Saviynt's full press release covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- APAC expansion specifics, including the new sales and support office and planned regional footprint growth
- The company's own description of partnership expansion with AWS, Microsoft, and integration partners
- Leadership commentary on how the platform vision is being positioned for enterprise identity governance
- Additional background on the funding, staffing, and go-to-market context behind the release
👉 Read Saviynt's press release on APAC growth and identity governance expansion →
APAC identity governance growth: what it means for IAM teams?
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services →
25/06/2026 7:50 am
APAC growth in identity governance reflects a market shift from policy design to operational delivery. This release is less about one vendor's expansion than about the fact that enterprises now buy governance outcomes under time pressure. The operating model has to support fast rollout, broad connector coverage, and usable risk controls, otherwise identity programmes stay stuck in design mode. Practitioners should treat deployment velocity as part of governance maturity, not as a separate implementation concern.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 1 in 4 organisations are already investing in dedicated NHI security capabilities, with an additional 60% planning to do so within the next twelve months, according to The State of Non-Human Identity Security.
- Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts, which shows how quickly governance ambition runs into incomplete identity inventory.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who should own identity governance when it spans cloud and enterprise systems?
A: Ownership should sit with the identity governance team, but implementation must be shared with application, cloud, and platform owners because the access data lives in their systems. If accountability stays central while operational control stays fragmented, certifications and exception handling will lag.
👉 Read our full editorial: Saviynt's APAC growth highlights demand for identity governance
