Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
03/06/2026 2:23 pm
TL;DR: Saviynt was recognized as an Overall Leader across four KuppingerCole evaluations covering IGA, PAM, SAP access control, and business application risk management, while also ranking highest in Product Leadership in the IGA report, according to Saviynt and KuppingerCole. The signal is broader than vendor recognition: identity governance is being framed around unified control of human, machine, privileged, non-human, and AI identities.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Saviynt: Saviynt Emerges as an Overall Leader Across Four KuppingerCole Reports
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should IAM teams govern human, non-human, and AI identities together?
A: Start by separating the identity types in policy, ownership, and review cadence, then define where controls can be shared and where they must remain distinct.
Q: Why do PAM and IGA need to be aligned in enterprise identity programmes?
A: Privileged access is only defensible when it is visible to governance and recertification.
Q: How do organisations know if identity governance is too fragmented?
A: Look for duplicated reviews, inconsistent owners, and exception handling that differs by platform rather than by policy.
Practitioner guidance
- Define identity scope by actor type Separate human, non-human, privileged, and AI identities in your governance model before you consolidate controls.
- Align PAM and IGA evidence Require the same identity record, owner, and policy basis to support privileged access approvals and access recertification.
- Map application risk into governance workflows Pull SAP and business application entitlement risk into routine access reviews so segregation-of-duties issues are evaluated alongside standard entitlement checks.
What's in the full analysis
Saviynt's full press release covers the recognition details and conference context this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- The exact KuppingerCole report categories and ranking language behind the four evaluation mentions.
- Quoted statements from Saviynt executives on AI-era identity security and unified governance.
- Conference session titles and speaker names tied to the European Identity and Cloud Conference.
- The company description of how its platform coverage spans workforce, machine, privileged, non-human, and AI identities.
👉 Read Saviynt’s press release on KuppingerCole recognition across identity security evaluations →
Identity governance scope is widening: what does this signal for teams?
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services →
03/06/2026 2:30 pm
Unified identity governance is now a structural requirement, not a programme preference. Saviynt’s recognition across IGA, PAM, SAP access control, and business application risk management reflects a market that is converging around one problem: the identity estate no longer fits into separate human, non-human, and privileged silos. That convergence matters because identity decisions made in one domain now affect the others, especially in hybrid and cloud environments. Practitioners should read this as a signal that governance scope is expanding faster than most operating models.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, with 46% confirmed and 26% suspected, according to The 2024 ESG Report: Managing Non-Human Identities.
- Enterprises that have experienced a compromised NHI averaged 2.7 separate incidents in the past 12 months, which shows how quickly one governance failure can become a repeat problem.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What should teams do when access control spans SAP and other business applications?
A: Treat business application entitlements as governance evidence, not just application administration. Teams should map segregation-of-duties risks, certification triggers, and remediation ownership into the same review process used for core identity controls, so business-process access is governed with the same discipline as technical privilege.
👉 Read our full editorial: Saviynt’s KuppingerCole recognition highlights identity governance scope
