Subscribe to the Non-Human & AI Identity Journal

Notifications
Clear all

PAM is shifting to action-based control, are your controls ready?


(@nhi-mgmt-group)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 5855
Topic starter  

TL;DR: KuppingerCole’s 2026 PAM Leadership Compass says privilege is moving from accounts to actions, with AI agents, service accounts, workloads, and automation pipelines now shaping privileged risk according to Delinea’s summary of the report. That shift makes point-in-time authorization and zero standing privilege more important than vault-centric controls alone.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Delinea: Beyond the vault, Delinea named a Leader in the 2026 KuppingerCole PAM Leadership Compass

By the numbers:

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should teams govern privilege when access is tied to actions instead of accounts?

A: Teams should catalogue the actions that can change systems, controls, or other identities, then bind approval and monitoring to those actions rather than to static account labels.

Q: Why do service accounts and workloads make traditional PAM less effective?

A: Because they often operate with inherited permissions, reusable credentials, or long-lived access that does not fit human login assumptions.

Q: What breaks when organisations rely on vaulting without point-of-action controls?

A: Vaulting can protect secrets at rest, but it does not stop an identity from using legitimate access once a session or credential is available.

Practitioner guidance

  • Reclassify privilege around actions Inventory privileged operations by the systems and data they can affect, then map each identity to the actions it can trigger rather than the account it owns.
  • Remove standing access before adding JIT Treat just-in-time access as incomplete until persistent administrative rights are removed, especially in cloud consoles, databases, and Kubernetes estates.
  • Separate secrets from runtime authorization Use secretless or workload identity patterns where possible so AI agents and automation do not need reusable credentials to reach private resources.

What's in the full analysis

Delinea's full blog post covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

  • The report’s category-by-category scoring and why KuppingerCole placed Delinea in the Leader position.
  • Specific examples of how the platform applies just-in-time access across databases, Kubernetes environments, cloud consoles, and server infrastructure.
  • The vendor’s description of discovery, posture analysis, and control as one connected motion for privileged access governance.
  • Additional detail on how the platform handles AI agent access without handing over reusable credentials.

👉 Read Delinea’s analysis of the 2026 KuppingerCole PAM Leadership Compass →

PAM is shifting to action-based control, are your controls ready?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →



   
Quote
(@mr-nhi)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 month ago
Posts: 5343
 

Privilege as an action, not an account, is the category shift PAM vendors now have to follow. The report’s central premise is structurally correct: an identity can be privileged without looking like an administrator account. That matters because service accounts, workloads, and AI agents often inherit authority that is only visible when they act. The implication is that PAM programmes need to be judged by whether they control sensitive actions, not by how many vaults or admin accounts they cover.

A few things that frame the scale:

  • 91% of former employee tokens remain active after offboarding, leaving organisations vulnerable to potential security breaches, according to The 2025 State of NHIs and Secrets in Cybersecurity.
  • 62% of all secrets are duplicated and stored in multiple locations, causing unnecessary redundancy and increasing the risk of accidental exposure, according to Entro Security's 2025 research.

A question worth separating out:

Q: Who is accountable when AI agents or automation misuse privileged access?

A: Accountability sits with the identity owner, the platform owner, and the governance function that approved the privileged path. If the organisation cannot assign responsibility for runtime actions taken by non-human identities, then the control model is incomplete. Frameworks like NIST CSF and zero trust governance require clear ownership before privilege is granted.

👉 Read our full editorial: PAM is shifting from accounts to actions across every identity



   
ReplyQuote
Share: