Topic starter
24/06/2026 11:11 pm
TL;DR: Gartner says 61% of procurement leaders describe their data as disorganized, inaccurate, or needing major quality improvements, and Pathlock’s inclusion in the 2026 Market Guide for SAM Tools reflects how weak asset data still distorts software usage, cost control, and compliance decisions. The real issue is not tool selection alone, but whether governance teams can trust the data model behind licensing decisions.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Pathlock: “Pathlock Recognized in the 2026 Gartner® Market Guide for Software Asset Management Tools”.
By the numbers:
- 61% of procurement leaders describe their data as disorganized, inaccurate or needing major quality improvements.
Key questions
Q: How should IAM teams improve software asset management data quality?
A: Start by aligning license data with identity, entitlement and contract records so every software decision is based on the same governed source of truth.
Q: Why does poor identity data distort software licensing decisions?
A: Because license consumption is often tied to roles, entitlements and user populations that are managed in identity systems.
Q: What breaks when software asset management data is incomplete?
A: The organisation loses confidence in who needs a license, which contracts are being consumed and whether software spend is being optimized correctly.
Practitioner guidance
- Define a governed license data model Create a common schema for users, roles, entitlements, contracts and usage so SAM and IGA teams are working from the same fields.
- Reconcile role data with license assignments Compare role-based access records with licensed user populations to find mismatches, duplicate assignments and stale entitlements.
- Standardise contract and cost fields Normalize license types, contract terms and cost models so software spend can be compared consistently across applications and vendors.
Bottom line: Weak software asset management is often a data integrity problem, not a tooling problem.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 13 hours ago by NHI Mgmt Group
25/06/2026 7:55 am
Software asset management is now a data governance problem before it is a tooling problem. The article’s central message is that organisations cannot optimise software usage or compliance if the underlying data is disorganised or inaccurate. That makes SAM dependent on identity, entitlement and contract data quality, not just on license discovery. Practitioners should treat license governance as a governed data pipeline, not a periodic spreadsheet exercise.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Should teams connect access reviews to license management?
A: Yes, when licenses are tied to roles or entitlements. Access reviews surface whether access still matches business need, and that same evidence can support license reclamation, reduce waste and improve compliance reporting across the application portfolio.
👉 Read our full editorial: Gartner’s SAM guidance exposes a data quality problem in licensing
This post was modified 13 hours ago by NHI Mgmt Group