Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
09/06/2026 11:33 pm
TL;DR: Misconfigurations and hidden vulnerabilities in Active Directory and Entra ID create exploitable blind spots, and Netwrix says PingCastle is positioned to help teams detect, prioritise, and remediate those gaps before attackers use identity pathways to move laterally. The real issue is not discovery alone, but whether governance can keep pace with hybrid identity exposure.
NHIMG editorial — here’s why we think this discussion matters
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should security teams handle hidden risks in Active Directory and Entra ID?
A: Teams should treat hidden directory risk as a governance and remediation problem, not a scan result.
Q: Why do hybrid identity environments create more risk than isolated directories?
A: Hybrid environments create more risk because access can flow across on-premises AD and Entra ID through sync, trusts, and delegated administration.
Practitioner guidance
- Inventory hybrid identity paths end to end Map AD objects, Entra ID relationships, sync links, nested groups, and delegated admin paths together so hidden access does not sit outside the review scope.
- Prioritise findings by privilege impact Rank vulnerabilities by whether they change authentication, escalation, or lateral movement potential rather than by raw count or scan order.
- Assign every shadow area an owner Tie each uncovered directory blind spot to a remediation owner and due date so no unreviewed access path remains in an ambiguous state.
What to expect at the briefing
Netwrix's full webinar covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Step-by-step guidance on using PingCastle to surface AD and Entra ID risks across hybrid environments
- Speaker-led discussion with Anthony Moillic and Vincent Le Toux on how to interpret and prioritise directory findings
- Practical examples of eliminating shadow areas and tracking security score movement over time
- The webinar format includes a direct walkthrough of the controls teams should review first when exposure is found
👉 Watch Netwrix's on-demand webinar on identifying Active Directory and Entra ID risks →
Active Directory and Entra ID risks are the governance gap teams miss?
Explore further
10/06/2026 1:55 am
Hybrid directory risk is not a hygiene issue, it is an identity control failure. When AD and Entra ID contain hidden vulnerabilities, the problem is that defenders no longer have a complete picture of who can reach what through directory relationships. That turns routine misconfiguration into a systemic access-risk problem across human accounts, service identities, and synced objects. Practitioners should treat directory visibility as a control boundary, not a reporting feature.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, according to The 2024 ESG Report: Managing Non-Human Identities.
- Two-thirds of enterprises have endured a successful cyberattack resulting from compromised non-human identities, with a quarter encountering multiple attacks.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How can organisations reduce shadow areas in AD and Entra ID?
A: They should continuously reconcile directory objects, permissions, and sync-linked identities, then link each uncovered gap to a named owner and a fix path. Shadow areas shrink when governance is tied to specific access paths rather than general awareness or periodic review alone.
👉 Read our full editorial: Active Directory risk visibility gaps are widening in Entra ID environments
