Topic starter
10/06/2026 10:32 pm
TL;DR: Teams need reusable fraud controls that connect onboarding, account access, and transactional monitoring across business units; a free Fraud Prevention course adds 26 micro-learning sessions across six modules, with practical coverage of digital fraud foundations, detection methods, common schemes, and sector-specific workflows in crypto, financial services, iGaming, marketplaces, and e-commerce, according to Sumsub.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by SumSub: “Sumsub Academy Launches Free Fraud Prevention Course, Sharing Real Fraud Investigation Insights and Cases”.
Key questions
Q: How should fraud teams turn training into operational fraud defence?
A: By linking training to the control points where decisions happen: onboarding, access reviews, transaction monitoring and case investigation.
Q: What are the best practices for sector-specific fraud prevention workflows?
A: Build separate workflows for the business models you actually run, because crypto, financial services, iGaming, marketplaces and e-commerce generate different abuse patterns and response thresholds.
Practitioner guidance
- Map training to fraud control points Tie learning content to onboarding, account access and transactional review so teams practise the same decisions they make in production fraud operations.
- Build sector-specific fraud playbooks Create separate response paths for crypto, financial services, iGaming, marketplaces and e-commerce because abuse patterns and escalation thresholds differ materially.
- Connect fraud, AML and compliance workflows Use shared case definitions and handoff criteria so signals, investigations and decisions do not fragment across control owners.
Bottom line: Fraud training is most useful when it teaches repeatable operational decisions, not just fraud terminology.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 8 hours ago by NHI Mgmt Group
11/06/2026 2:36 am
Fraud prevention is becoming an identity governance problem, not just a fraud team problem. The course description spans user verification, account access, transaction monitoring, and AML-adjacent operational practice, which is the real story. When fraud controls sit outside IAM and lifecycle governance, the organisation sees symptoms but not identity continuity. The practitioner implication is that fraud strategy must be connected to identity governance across the full user and account lifecycle.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Two-thirds of enterprises have endured a successful cyberattack resulting from compromised non-human identities, with a quarter encountering multiple attacks, according to The 2024 ESG Report: Managing Non-Human Identities.
- 72% of organisations have experienced or suspect they have experienced a breach of non-human identities, including 46% confirmed and 26% suspected.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What role should fraud training play in a wider governance programme?
A: It should support the control environment, not sit outside it. Good training changes how teams classify risk, route cases, and document decisions. When fraud education is tied to governance, it helps compliance, security, and operations act from the same playbook instead of working from different assumptions.
👉 Read our full editorial: Fraud prevention training shifts toward operational defense
12/06/2026 4:10 am
Fraud prevention training has to be operational before it can be educational. Teams do not fail because they lack exposure to fraud terminology; they fail because signals, investigations and responses are not wired into a shared operating model. A course that links onboarding, access and transaction stages is more useful than one that only explains common schemes. The practitioner takeaway is that fraud capability should be measured by workflow execution, not content completion.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Nearly 60% of companies reported that fraud losses were still increasing in 2025.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do organisations know whether fraud prevention training is working?
A: Look for better case quality, faster escalation, fewer repeated review mistakes, and stronger correlation between verification, access, and transaction signals. If training is effective, teams should make more consistent decisions with the same evidence and spend less time re-litigating the same fraud pattern in separate functions.
👉 Read our full editorial: Fraud prevention training shifts toward operational defense
This post was modified 8 hours ago by NHI Mgmt Group