Topic starter
25/06/2026 3:15 pm
TL;DR: Demand for identity security is growing across human, non-human and AI identities, while attacks tied to stolen identities and compromised credentials are also rising, according to Permiso Security. The underlying message is that identity inventory, posture, and threat detection are converging into one governance problem.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Permiso Security: “Permiso Builds Leadership Team for Next Stage of Growth as Demand Builds for Identity Security Protection”.
Key questions
A: Security teams should treat trusted access as the primary control problem.
Q: How should IAM teams govern human, non-human, and AI identities together?
A: Start by separating the identity types in policy, ownership, and review cadence, then define where controls can be shared and where they must remain distinct.
Q: What are the best practices for identity inventory in hybrid environments?
A: Use a continuous inventory that spans cloud, SaaS and delegated access paths, then keep ownership and privilege data linked to each identity record.
Practitioner guidance
- Map the full identity fabric Inventory human, non-human and AI identities across cloud and SaaS so ownership, privilege scope and lifecycle state are visible in one place.
- Tie posture to detection Feed entitlement and configuration drift into identity threat detection so trusted credentials are assessed for misuse, not just existence.
- Review high-risk valid accounts Prioritise accounts that can access sensitive records or operational systems and verify whether their current access still matches business need.
Bottom line: Identity security is no longer a niche control area. It is becoming the common governance layer for human, non-human and AI access across modern environments.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
25/06/2026 4:40 pm
Identity security is becoming the control layer that unifies human, NHI and AI governance. The article is not really about personnel change. It is a market signal that organisations are collapsing separate conversations about inventory, posture and threat detection into one identity governance problem. That matters because the same access model now spans people, service identities and AI-enabled workflows, so programme design has to follow the identity fabric rather than the old tool silos.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do you know if identity threat detection is actually working?
A: Look for shorter mean time to detect and mean time to respond, plus fewer incidents where suspicious sessions persist for hours. Successful programmes also show accurate correlation between behavioural anomalies and real misuse, not just alert volume. If detection cannot trigger containment before damage spreads, the programme is still mostly observational.
👉 Read our full editorial: Permiso leadership changes signal rising demand for identity security