Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
12/06/2026 9:04 pm
TL;DR: Access management is framed as a way to reduce manual provisioning delays, improve employee experience, and tighten offboarding control across SaaS access, according to Zluri. The underlying problem is broader than efficiency: access review, revocation, and permission scoping fail when identity governance depends on slow human workflows.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Why Is Access Management Crucial for an Organization?
By the numbers:
- Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts.
- 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface.
- Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them.
Questions worth separating out
Q: What breaks when access management is still handled manually?
A: Manual access handling breaks down when onboarding, role changes, and offboarding require too many human steps to stay accurate.
Q: Why do access governance failures often show up first in offboarding?
A: Offboarding exposes governance failure because it forces teams to remove access everywhere at once.
Q: How do you know if access management is actually working?
A: Access management is working when new users receive only the access they need, role changes remove unneeded access quickly, and offboarding removes every entitlement without exceptions.
Practitioner guidance
- Map every identity lifecycle step to a control owner Assign clear ownership for onboarding, role changes, and offboarding so provisioning and revocation are never handled informally.
- Automate complete deprovisioning checks Build offboarding workflows that enumerate every app, group, and delegated permission before closing the case.
- Run access reviews against real entitlement data Do not certify access from spreadsheets or stale role mappings.
What's in the full article
Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Workflow examples for onboarding, role changes, and offboarding across SaaS applications
- Details on using an employee app store and reusable playbooks to speed access requests
- Practical guidance on consolidating access visibility into a single dashboard for review
- Discussion of app risk scoring and how it can support access decisions
👉 Read Zluri's analysis of why access management matters for organisations →
Access management gaps: are onboarding and offboarding keeping up?
Explore further
12/06/2026 10:53 pm
Access management is really lifecycle governance in disguise. The article presents access management as an efficiency layer, but the core issue is whether identity events are handled fast enough and completely enough to preserve control. Once provisioning and deprovisioning lag behind business activity, organisations lose the ability to enforce least privilege at the moment it matters. The practitioner conclusion is that access management must be judged by lifecycle completeness, not workflow convenience.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them, according to the Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
- 91.6% of secrets remain valid five days after the targeted organisation is notified, showing a critical gap in remediation procedures.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who is accountable when access is not revoked on time?
A: Accountability should sit with the identity or application owner who is responsible for the full lifecycle, not only the help desk that processed the ticket. If revocation depends on multiple teams, the organisation needs a single control owner for the end-to-end workflow so stale access does not remain unowned.
👉 Read our full editorial: Access management gaps still slow onboarding, offboarding and control
