Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
24/06/2026 11:45 pm
TL;DR: Application connectivity determines whether identity teams can apply access requests, approvals, certifications, and visibility consistently across cloud, on-premises, and custom apps, according to SailPoint. Without that layer, governance remains fragmented and business-critical access risks stay hidden until enforcement becomes operationally expensive.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by SailPoint: Blog Connectivity: The secret weapon to identity security success
By the numbers:
- SailPoint says its connector library supports more than 1,100 unique enterprise applications.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should identity teams prioritise application connectivity for access governance?
A: Start with the applications that hold the highest business and privilege risk, then verify whether identity teams can request, approve, certify, and revoke access through one governed path.
Q: Why do disconnected applications create identity governance blind spots?
A: Disconnected applications force teams back into manual access handling, which breaks the consistency needed for reviews, approvals, and revocation.
Q: What do teams get wrong about connector breadth in identity programmes?
A: They often treat connector availability as proof of coverage.
Practitioner guidance
- Inventory applications by governance reach, not just by presence Classify each application by whether identity teams can request, approve, certify, revoke, and log access through the same integration path.
- Test connector depth against real entitlement structures Validate whether the connector exposes application-specific roles, custom attributes, and non-standard privilege models before you depend on it for access reviews or lifecycle actions.
- Fold custom and legacy apps into the same lifecycle process Do not leave homegrown or older systems in manual exception paths.
What's in the full article
SailPoint's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Specific connector library claims and product coverage details across enterprise and custom applications
- Examples of how SaaS, on-premises, and hybrid integrations are handled in SailPoint's platform
- Implementation-oriented descriptions of standards-based connectivity using REST, JDBC, SCIM, and file-based approaches
- Product positioning for single-source configuration and event-driven identity actions across application architectures
👉 Read SailPoint's blog on how application connectivity supports identity security →
Application connectivity and access governance: what teams are missing?
Explore further
25/06/2026 8:40 am
Application connectivity is the hidden dependency that determines whether identity governance is real or performative. Access policy only matters when it can be executed across the applications where identities actually work, and disconnected systems turn governance into a partial control plane. The practical conclusion is that programme maturity should be measured by governable coverage, not by policy volume.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Companies are dedicating an average of 32.4% of their security budgets to secrets management and code security, with US organisations leading at 40.8%, according to The State of Secrets in AppSec.
- Only 44% of developers are reported to follow security best practices for secrets management, exposing a significant developer behaviour gap.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should organisations govern custom applications that resist standard integration?
A: Treat custom applications as first-class identity targets and require them to participate in the same lifecycle and certification process as standard systems wherever possible. If they cannot, the exception should be explicit, risk-owned, and time-bound rather than left as a permanent manual workaround.
👉 Read our full editorial: Application connectivity is now central to identity security governance
