Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
07/06/2026 9:24 pm
TL;DR: AWS Cognito handles app authentication, token refresh, federation, and MFA, but the article argues it is not the right fit when teams need centralized access for databases, servers, and Kubernetes, according to StrongDM. The real issue is that app login controls and infrastructure access governance solve different problems.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by StrongDM: Access Alternatives to AWS Cognito
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should teams separate application authentication from privileged infrastructure access?
A: Teams should treat application authentication and privileged infrastructure access as different governance layers.
Q: Why do ephemeral credentials still need governance?
A: Ephemeral credentials still need governance because short lifetime does not prove ownership, purpose, or revocation.
Q: What breaks when app login tools are used for backend access control?
A: What breaks is auditability and control boundary clarity.
Practitioner guidance
- Separate customer identity from infrastructure access governance Map application sign-in flows to customer identity controls and keep database, server, and Kubernetes access under a dedicated privileged access model with explicit session oversight.
- Require session visibility for privileged workloads If teams need SSH, RDP, SQL, or kubectl access, require command logging, session recording, and revocation workflows that operate outside the application authentication layer.
- Review ephemeral credential ownership and revocation Document who issues each credential, what resource it can touch, and the exact revocation path so short-lived access does not become operationally ungoverned.
What's in the full article
StrongDM's full blog covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Feature-by-feature comparisons of Cognito alternatives for databases, servers, and Kubernetes access.
- Product-specific deployment and integration notes for teams that need infrastructure access control.
- Vendor-level discussion of session logging, SSH, RDP, and kubectl visibility in practice.
- The article's breakdown of where Cognito fits, and where it stops being sufficient for backend access.
👉 Read StrongDM's comparison of AWS Cognito alternatives for infrastructure access →
AWS Cognito alternatives: what IAM teams should compare now?
Explore further
08/06/2026 9:20 am
Application authentication and infrastructure access are different governance problems. AWS Cognito addresses user sign-in, federation, and token handling for applications, but that does not solve the broader identity problem of database, server, and Kubernetes access. IAM teams that blur those boundaries end up with incomplete visibility and weak offboarding across non-human and privileged access. The practitioner conclusion is simple: the access model must match the resource class.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 64% of valid secrets leaked in 2022 are still valid and exploitable today, proving that detection alone is not enough without automated revocation, according to The State of Secrets Sprawl 2026.
- DeepSeek alone generated 113,000 new exposed API keys in 2025, illustrating how new AI providers create credential exposure before security guardrails catch up.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do security teams decide whether to keep Cognito-like tools in scope?
A: Security teams should keep them in scope only for customer identity use cases such as sign-up, sign-in, federation, and token handling. If the requirement includes privileged backend access or infrastructure governance, they need a different access model.
👉 Read our full editorial: AWS Cognito alternatives expose the access-control gap in apps
