BetterCloud vs Okta: what this comparison means for IAM teams

TL;DR: Identity governance tools solve different sides of access management, with one focused on SaaS access control and the other on authentication, MFA, and contextual policies, while both still require careful fit analysis for access review, provisioning, and compliance workflows, according to Zluri. The deeper issue is that IGA selection is about governance scope, not feature count, especially when SaaS sprawl and lifecycle automation are involved.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: BetterCloud vs Okta and the IGA capabilities each covers

By the numbers:

• Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them.
• 70% of organisations grant AI systems more access than they would give a human employee performing the exact same job.
• Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security.

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should security teams choose between authentication controls and IGA controls?

A: Security teams should choose them as complementary layers, not substitutes.

Q: When does access automation create more risk than manual review?

A: Access automation creates more risk when the target applications cannot reliably revoke access, when source events are poor quality, or when exceptions are too complex for a standard workflow.

Q: What do security teams get wrong about access reviews?

A: They often treat completed certifications as proof of control.

Practitioner guidance

• Separate authentication from entitlement governance Create a control map that assigns MFA, sign-on policy, and contextual risk decisions to the authentication layer while reserving app access, role cleanup, and certification for the governance layer.
• Tie lifecycle automation to authoritative events Use HR or identity source changes to drive provisioning and deprovisioning for SaaS apps, then validate that each target application can actually revoke access cleanly.
• Require review evidence beyond entitlement lists Build access reviews around last-login signals, role data, admin exceptions, and audit logs so reviewers can judge whether access is still appropriate.

What's in the full article

Zluri's full comparison covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Feature-by-feature comparison of BetterCloud and Okta across access governance, authentication, and SaaS administration
• Workflow detail on provisioning, deprovisioning, and automated access review execution
• Customer review and rating context that may help with vendor shortlisting
• Expanded discussion of Zluri as an alternative for access discovery and certification workflows

👉 Read Zluri's comparison of BetterCloud and Okta for IGA selection →

BetterCloud vs Okta: what this comparison means for IAM teams?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →