TL;DR: Cloud asset management software now overlaps with identity governance because the same tools that inventory cloud resources also track SaaS access, licenses, renewals, and deprovisioning workflows, according to Zluri. That makes the category less about asset lists and more about controlling access, lifecycle, and audit readiness across human and non-human identities.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Zluri: “Top 12 Cloud Asset Management Software [2026 Updated]”.
Key questions
Q: What should teams do when cloud security and identity governance are managed separately?
A: They should unify app inventory, access review, and remediation workflows so cloud policy can be enforced from the identity system outward.
Q: Why do unused SaaS licences create identity risk as well as cost waste?
A: Unused licences often indicate that apps are still licensed after the people or teams that justified them have changed.
Q: What breaks when SaaS offboarding is handled manually?
A: Manual offboarding usually breaks because it depends on people remembering every application, integration, and delegated account that needs removal.
Practitioner guidance
- Map SaaS assets to named owners Create a single ownership record for each SaaS app, licence pool and integration so renewal, review and removal decisions have an accountable party.
- Join discovery feeds to identity sources Correlate cloud asset discovery with IDP, SSO, HR and directory data so the inventory shows who has access, who used it and where it came from.
- Tie renewals to recertification Require renewal review to check whether access, licences and business justification still line up before automatic contract extension.
Bottom line: Cloud asset management is converging with identity governance because discovery, licensing, renewal and deprovisioning now sit in one operating model.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
Cloud asset management is becoming an identity control plane: once discovery, usage tracking, renewal alerts and deprovisioning sit in the same workflow, the product category stops behaving like a simple inventory tool. The governance question shifts to who approved access, who still uses it and who is accountable for removal. Practitioners should read this as a widening identity surface, not a tooling feature list.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Nearly 60% of IT leaders cite restrictive cost and complexity as a weakness of legacy identity governance, according to the 2025 State of Identity Governance Report.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do I tell whether cloud asset management is actually improving governance?
A: Look for evidence that the inventory is driving action. Useful signals include fewer abandoned apps, shorter renewal review cycles, clearer ownership, and deprovisioning that follows usage decline instead of waiting for the next audit or budget review.
👉 Read our full editorial: Cloud asset management is becoming identity asset management