Topic starter
10/07/2026 9:19 pm
TL;DR: Google Wallet, Apple Wallet, Chrome 141, and iOS 26 are converging on the W3C Digital Credentials API while the EU hardens its year-end wallet mandate, creating a standards-based path for selective-disclosure identity claims across consumer and regulated use cases, according to Authsignal. The governance problem is not authentication alone, but verifier adoption, trust alignment, and lifecycle control for claims that now travel outside traditional IAM boundaries.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Authsignal: “Digital ID is going mainstream in 2026”.
Key questions
Q: How should IAM teams govern digital credential acceptance in browser-based flows?
A: IAM teams should define which issuers, origins, claim types, and device contexts are acceptable before exposing browser-based credential presentation to customers or partners.
Q: When should organisations use selective disclosure instead of full identity document capture?
A: Use selective disclosure whenever the business requirement can be satisfied by a single attribute or limited set of claims.
Q: What breaks when browser and wallet credential flows rely on custom schemes?
A: Custom schemes create ambiguity over which wallet is selected, weaken interoperability, and make the user experience depend on implementation quirks rather than a common browser contract.
Practitioner guidance
- Define claim acceptance policy Specify which credential types, issuers, origins, and attributes your applications will accept before teams start wiring wallet flows into customer journeys.
- Minimise verifier data requests Require only the specific attribute needed for the transaction, and block flows that ask for full identity documents when selective disclosure is sufficient.
- Review browser trust assumptions Check how your web applications validate the requesting origin, device context, and presentation response before treating the result as a trusted identity proof.
Bottom line: Digital credentials are moving into mainstream wallet and browser flows, which shifts identity governance from login events to claim presentation and acceptance.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
10/07/2026 9:42 pm
Digital credential presentation is becoming a governed trust workflow, not just an identity feature. The practical shift is that verifiers now need explicit policy around which origins, claim types, and device contexts they accept. Once wallets and browsers standardise the handoff, identity teams can no longer treat each use case as an isolated integration. The practitioner conclusion is that governance moves from authentication alone to claim issuance, presentation, and acceptance.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What should security teams do when digital credentials move outside the traditional IAM stack?
A: Security teams should treat issuer trust, presentation policy, revocation expectations, and verifier acceptance as part of the identity architecture. If those controls sit outside the IAM programme, the organisation may authenticate users correctly but still accept claims through ungoverned pathways.
👉 Read our full editorial: Digital IDs are becoming mainstream as wallets and browsers converge