Topic starter
12/06/2026 12:55 am
TL;DR: Disaster recovery planning is presented as a way to restore critical systems after outages, cyberattacks, and human error, with Zluri stressing objectives, scope, backups, testing, and role clarity. The deeper issue is that DRP only works when identity, access, and recovery ownership are already governed, making it a lifecycle problem as much as an operations one.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Zluri: “How to Create a Disaster Recovery Plan?”.
Key questions
Q: What breaks in disaster recovery when identity ownership is out of date?
A: Recovery slows or fails because the team cannot quickly determine who can restore systems, approve access, or receive recovered data.
Q: What breaks when a disaster recovery plan excludes identity governance?
A: Recovery often restores systems without restoring control.
Q: How do organisations know whether their disaster recovery plan is actually working?
A: They test whether critical services can be restored within the stated RTO and RPO, whether the right people can access the right systems, and whether runbooks can be executed in order.
Practitioner guidance
- Map recovery-critical identities Identify the users, admins, service accounts, and application owners that are required to restore each critical system, then keep that inventory aligned with the live environment.
- Tie backup plans to ownership Document who approves restores, who receives recovered data, and who is responsible when a system is rebuilt after staff movement or offboarding.
- Test identity-dependent recovery paths Run disaster recovery exercises that include access validation, contact escalation, and application ownership checks, not just technical restoration steps.
Bottom line: Disaster recovery planning is not just about restoring systems. It also depends on current identity ownership, valid access paths, and clear recovery responsibility.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
12/06/2026 10:29 am
Recovery planning fails when identity governance is treated as separate from resilience. The article describes disaster recovery as a roadmap for restoring operations, but the roadmap only works if the organisation already knows which identities, roles, and ownership paths are current. That makes DRP a governance dependency, not just a technical continuity document. Practitioners should treat recovery readiness as a test of identity state.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What should security teams check before relying on a disaster recovery plan?
A: They should confirm that critical systems are in scope, backup and restore procedures are current, and the people listed to run recovery still hold the relevant roles. They should also check that offboarding, admin access, and application ownership have been kept current. Otherwise the plan may fail when disruption hits.
👉 Read our full editorial: Disaster recovery planning exposes the real identity governance gap
This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group