Notifications
Clear all
08/06/2026 5:33 pm
Authentication complexity is an identity governance failure, not a user inconvenience. The article shows that many organisations now run overlapping MFA methods, siloed identity systems, and inconsistent user experiences. That is a governance problem because assurance becomes uneven across access paths, and uneven assurance is easier to bypass. Practitioners should treat authentication architecture as a policy standardisation issue, not a collection of local tooling choices.
A few things that frame the scale:
- 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface, according to Ultimate Guide to NHIs.
- 71% of NHIs are not rotated within recommended time frames, increasing the risk of compromise over time.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How can teams tell whether authentication controls are actually working?
A: They should measure bypass rates, exception volumes, help desk reset demand, and the consistency of authenticator strength across applications. If users keep escaping into weaker paths or support teams keep creating local exceptions, the control is not functioning as a stable programme.
👉 Read our full editorial: Enhanced authentication choices expose the real IAM tradeoffs
