Enhanced due diligence: where do identity checks stop and EDD begin?

TL;DR: Enhanced due diligence is the extra scrutiny required by the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 in higher-risk cases, according to OneID, and it applies to PEPs, high-risk third countries, correspondent relationships, unusual transactions and other flagged situations. Identity verification supports the file, but it does not replace source-of-funds checks, senior sign-off or enhanced monitoring.

Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by OneID: “Enhanced due diligence (EDD): when it applies and what it requires”.

Key questions

Q: When should organisations apply enhanced due diligence instead of a standard CDD process?

A: Enhanced due diligence is appropriate when the customer, business activity, geography, or transaction pattern suggests higher money laundering or fraud risk.

Q: Why do source of funds and source of wealth matter in EDD?

A: They answer different questions.

Q: What breaks when document verification is treated as the same thing as identity verification?

A: The main failure is overtrust.

Practitioner guidance

• Separate EDD triggers from identity verification Build the onboarding workflow so analysts first determine whether Regulation 33 applies, then open the higher-risk evidence path only when the trigger is present.
• Define distinct evidence sets for funds and wealth Create different evidence requirements for source of funds and source of wealth so the team does not reuse one document type for both questions.
• Document approval paths by trigger type Set out who approves PEP cases, high-risk third-country cases and unusual-transaction cases, because each trigger changes the governance burden.

Bottom line: Enhanced due diligence is a higher-risk control layer that sits on top of standard due diligence, not a substitute for it.

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →  |  Our Services →  |  Read the full analysis →