Entitlement management software: what IAM teams need to fix

TL;DR: Entitlement management software is presented as a way to centralise access requests, reviews, provisioning, and audit reporting across user entitlements, according to Zluri. The governance issue is broader than tooling choice: identity teams still need lifecycle discipline, least-privilege enforcement, and reviewable controls that keep pace with role changes and shadow applications.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Security & Compliance Top 10 Entitlement Management Software

By the numbers:

• 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface.
• Only 5.7% of organisations have full visibility into their service accounts.
• Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them.

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should security teams govern entitlement management across human users and NHIs?

A: Treat entitlement management as a lifecycle control, not just an access-granting tool.

Q: Why do entitlement tools still leave organisations exposed to over-privilege?

A: Because tools automate the model you give them.

Q: How do organisations know whether access reviews are actually working?

A: They should measure how many entitlements were revoked, corrected, or time-bounded after a review, not just whether the campaign closed on schedule.

Practitioner guidance

• Inventory entitlements by identity type Map entitlements separately for human users, service accounts, and application-linked identities so ownership and review responsibility are clear.
• Tighten role design before expanding automation Review RBAC roles for excessive breadth, orphaned permissions, and exceptions that have become permanent.
• Bind access reviews to revocation Ensure every certification outcome can trigger removal in the source system, with an auditable record of who approved or denied access.

What's in the full article

Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Feature-by-feature comparison of entitlement management functions across the listed tools
• Vendor-specific access review and provisioning workflows that implementation teams may want to evaluate in detail
• Per-tool customer ratings and product positioning that help with shortlist research
• Additional configuration and integration claims for SCIM, HRMS, and ITSM environments

👉 Read Zluri's entitlement management software overview →

Entitlement management software: what IAM teams need to fix?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →