Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
12/06/2026 12:20 am
TL;DR: As headcount, offices, and device fleets grow, manual hardware tracking breaks down into missed onboarding, unreturned devices, weak audit trails, and rising spend, according to JumpCloud. The governance issue is no longer inventory hygiene, but whether asset management is linked tightly enough to identity and lifecycle controls to stay reliable at scale.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by JumpCloud: hardware asset management at scale and why manual tracking breaks down
By the numbers:
- The primary drivers behind increases in IT budgets are upgrades to IT infrastructure at 57%, followed by security concerns at 38% and employee growth at 32%.
- Global spending on information technology is projected to reach approximately $5.6 trillion in 2025, representing an increase of about four percent from 2024.
- Global spending on devices is expected to reach approximately $805.7 billion in 2025, marking a 9.5% increase compared to $735.8 billion spent in 2024.
Questions worth separating out
Q: What breaks when hardware asset tracking is still spreadsheet-based at scale?
A: Spreadsheet-based tracking breaks when device counts, locations, and lifecycle events grow faster than manual updates can keep up.
Q: Why does hardware asset management matter to identity and access teams?
A: Hardware management matters because devices are part of the access chain.
Q: How do teams know whether asset governance is actually working?
A: Look for evidence that every device has a current owner, a verifiable location, a recorded condition, and a documented return or disposal path.
Practitioner guidance
- Centralise device ownership records Replace spreadsheet tracking with a system that records assignment, location, condition, and lifecycle state in one authoritative inventory.
- Link assets to joiner-mover-leaver workflows Require every laptop, monitor, and peripheral to change status when the user’s employment or role changes, so offboarding and reassignment stay synchronized.
- Reconcile inventory against HR and procurement data Run scheduled checks that compare asset records with HR exits, purchasing logs, and return status so missing hardware is found before audit or loss becomes visible.
What's in the full article
JumpCloud's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:
- Specific examples of how manual asset tracking breaks down during hiring, offboarding, and office expansion.
- The article's full breakdown of cost leakage from idle, lost, and unreclaimed hardware across the fleet.
- Practical discussion of compliance pressure from SOC 2 and ISO 27001 record-keeping expectations.
- How JumpCloud frames centralized visibility and automation for teams that are past spreadsheet-level management.
👉 Read JumpCloud's analysis of why hardware asset management breaks at scale →
Hardware asset management at scale: where are teams losing control?
Explore further
12/06/2026 9:31 am
Device lifecycle opacity is the real failure mode, not inventory size. The article describes a scale problem, but the more precise governance issue is that asset ownership becomes ambiguous once records are split across spreadsheets, tickets, and informal knowledge. That ambiguity breaks the control chain required for offboarding, reassignment, and audit evidence. The implication is that lifecycle governance fails when the organisation cannot prove where a device sits in its state transition.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 19.6% of security professionals express strong confidence in their organisation's ability to securely manage non-human workload identities, according to the 2024 Non-Human Identity Security Report.
- 35.6% of organisations cite managing consistent access across hybrid and multi-cloud environments as their top NHI security challenge.
A question worth separating out:
Q: Who is accountable when a company-owned device goes missing after offboarding?
A: Accountability sits with the organisation’s lifecycle process, not a single spreadsheet owner. Security, IT operations, HR, and procurement each hold part of the chain. When the handoff is not tracked, the organisation loses both the device and the evidence needed to show where the process failed.
👉 Read our full editorial: Hardware asset management at scale: why spreadsheets break down
