Subscribe to the Non-Human & AI Identity Journal

Notifications
Clear all

IAM and PAM integration: is your access governance really connected?


(@nhi-mgmt-group)
Member Moderator
Joined: 1 year ago
Posts: 12396
Topic starter  

TL;DR: Financial services firms that run IAM and PAM as separate domains create inconsistent enforcement, fragmented audit evidence, and manual reconciliation overhead, according to Hitachi ID’s analysis. The governance gap is not theoretical: access controls that cannot be traced end to end are operationally weak and harder to defend under scrutiny.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Hitachi ID: IAM and PAM integration in financial services

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should financial services teams integrate IAM and PAM without creating more operational friction?

A: Start by connecting the approval step in IAM to the enforcement step in PAM, then prove the linkage through shared logging and exception handling.

Q: Why do separate IAM and PAM systems create audit problems?

A: Because approval evidence, runtime privilege, and session records end up in different systems, auditors cannot easily prove that the access granted was the access used.

Q: What breaks when PAM is treated as separate from IAM?

A: Governance breaks first.

Practitioner guidance

  • Map approval-to-enforcement handoffs Identify every IAM workflow that should trigger PAM controls and verify the handoff is automated, recorded, and reversible.
  • Unify audit evidence across both systems Create a single reporting model that ties access request, approval, privileged use, and revocation into one reviewable evidence chain.
  • Extend governance to credential lifecycle gaps Inventory legacy application passwords, service accounts, and non-SSO credentials that sit outside normal IAM and PAM coverage.

What's in the full article

Hitachi ID's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

  • A deeper comparison of loosely coupled, workflow-integrated, and unified platform models for financial services identity governance
  • More implementation detail on onboarding, access review, and incident response workflows that rely on IAM and PAM together
  • Expanded discussion of password governance for legacy applications, service accounts, and non-SSO environments
  • The vendor's own examples of how Bravura Privilege and Bravura Pass fit into an existing IAM or IGA stack

👉 Read Hitachi ID's analysis of IAM and PAM integration in financial services →

IAM and PAM integration: is your access governance really connected?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →



   
Quote
Share: