Topic starter
12/06/2026 1:00 am
TL;DR: Cloud IAM gets harder as access, provisioning, integrations, and compliance reporting spread across SaaS and departmental admins, according to Zluri. The core issue is not authentication alone but lifecycle control, visibility, and least-privilege enforcement across a decentralised identity surface.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Zluri: “Top 4 Identity and Access Management Challenges”.
Key questions
Q: How should security teams centralise cloud IAM governance across SaaS and departmental admins?
A: Security teams should build a single control view for identities, applications, and entitlements, then require local app owners to operate inside that governance model.
Q: Why do cloud IAM programmes struggle with least privilege in decentralised environments?
A: They struggle because access is often granted through separate app admins, manual requests, and business-language approvals that do not map cleanly to technical entitlements.
Q: What breaks when user lifecycle management is handled partly outside central IAM?
A: Revocation becomes inconsistent, especially at offboarding and role-change events.
Practitioner guidance
- Centralise entitlement visibility Consolidate directory data, SaaS app inventory, and login events into one governance view so IT can see who has access and which apps are active or unused.
- Automate joiner-mover-leaver workflows Tie onboarding, role changes, and offboarding to actual application entitlements so access is granted and removed across all apps, not only the core directory or email stack.
- Review departmental admin privileges Identify where SaaS administrators outside central IT can grant access, then require those paths to follow the same approval and revocation standards as the main IAM process.
Bottom line: Cloud IAM governance fails when visibility, lifecycle control, and application-level administration are split across multiple owners.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
12/06/2026 10:36 am
Cloud IAM governance now fails first at the visibility layer: the problem is not simply that access exists, but that no single control plane can explain where it exists across SaaS, departmental admins, and federated directories. When entitlement data is fragmented, least privilege becomes an assertion rather than an enforceable state. Practitioners should treat fragmented visibility as an identity governance failure, not a reporting inconvenience.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do teams know if machine IAM is actually working?
A: Look for whether every machine identity has an accountable owner, a documented purpose, and short-lived access that can be revoked without breaking unrelated services. If access still depends on broad standing secrets or exceptions, the programme is governing credentials, not identities. Effective machine IAM reduces both ambiguity and privilege duration.
👉 Read our full editorial: IAM challenges in the cloud reveal gaps in access governance
This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group