Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
12/06/2026 1:00 am
TL;DR: Identity and access management consulting is increasingly being used to close gaps in access design, lifecycle control, privileged access, and zero-trust alignment as enterprises move faster into cloud, SaaS, and AI-driven operations, according to Zluri. The real issue is not tooling alone, but whether programmes can govern identity consistently across people, service accounts, and emerging machine identities.
NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Identity and access management consulting companies
By the numbers:
- Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security.
Questions worth separating out
Q: How should organisations choose between IAM consulting firms and in-house delivery?
A: Choose consulting when the programme needs operating-model design, cross-system remediation, or specialist implementation depth that internal teams cannot staff quickly.
Q: Why do IAM programmes still fail even after tool implementation?
A: Tooling fails when governance decisions are still unclear.
Q: What do security teams get wrong about identity lifecycle management?
A: They often treat lifecycle management as an onboarding task instead of an ongoing access discipline.
Practitioner guidance
- Map advisory work to governance decisions Before selecting an IAM consultancy, list the specific decisions that need resolution: authoritative identity source, entitlement ownership, review cadence, privileged elevation rules, and offboarding responsibility.
- Treat lifecycle management as a control objective Require every IAM programme to document how joiner, mover, and leaver events propagate through HR, directories, SaaS applications, and privileged systems.
- Scope PAM beyond human admins Include service accounts, API access, and automation credentials in privileged-access reviews where they can reach production systems or sensitive data.
What's in the full article
Zluri's full article covers the consulting-firm profiles and capability lists this post intentionally leaves at the strategic level:
- Firm-by-firm service breakdowns for IAM advisory, implementation, and managed services
- Vendor-facing descriptions of SSO, MFA, PAM, RBAC, and lifecycle management offerings
- Customer rating snapshots and company positioning details that help compare providers
- The original article's broader directory-style format for readers evaluating consulting options
👉 Read Zluri's roundup of identity and access management consulting companies →
Identity and access management consulting - where teams are falling short?
Explore further
12/06/2026 10:37 am
IAM consulting now functions as identity operating-model design, not a services category. The firms in this article are being used to bridge the gap between control objectives and the real state of directories, SaaS apps, HR feeds, federation, and privileged access. That makes the consulting question less about implementation labour and more about whether the organisation can actually govern identity across multiple control planes. Practitioners should judge advisory work by whether it clarifies ownership, lifecycle, and entitlement rules.
A few things that frame the scale:
- Only 44% of organisations have implemented any policies to manage their AI agents, despite 92% agreeing that governing AI agents is critical to enterprise security, according to The 2026 Infrastructure Identity Survey.
- Another finding from the same survey shows that 70% of organisations grant AI systems more access than they would give a human employee performing the exact same job.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How do you know if privileged access governance is actually working?
A: It is working when standing privilege falls, emergency elevation is rare, and reviews can clearly show why each high-risk entitlement exists. If privileged accounts remain broadly reusable across unrelated tasks, the programme is still carrying excess blast radius even if the policy looks mature on paper.
👉 Read our full editorial: Identity and access management consulting: what teams need now
