Topic starter
06/06/2026 2:20 am
TL;DR: Identity fabric is emerging as the orchestration layer that connects siloed identity systems across multi-cloud and hybrid environments, with Strata Identity arguing that interoperability and separation of authorization from business logic are now central to cloud security. The governance problem is no longer isolated SSO or directory management, but control consistency across fragmented identity domains.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Strata Identity: “Identity Fabric”.
Key questions
Q: How should teams govern delegated access across cloud identities?
A: Teams should govern delegated access by treating every grant, role chain, and integration as a lifecycle-managed trust relationship.
Q: Why does embedding authorization logic directly in application code create risk at scale?
A: Embedding authorization in code usually creates tightly coupled rules that are hard to audit, reuse, and change safely.
Q: What breaks when cloud identity is isolated in name but not in the back end?
A: The programme can lose real separation even if the user experience looks dedicated.
Practitioner guidance
- Define a cross-cloud identity control plane Inventory where authentication, authorization, and entitlement decisions are currently made across clouds, directories, and applications.
- Separate policy from application logic Move authorization rules into a centrally governed policy layer so that applications request decisions instead of embedding access logic in code.
- Map identity handoff points across silos Trace where identity context is lost when a user, workload, or application crosses from one cloud domain to another.
Bottom line: Multi-cloud and hybrid estates create identity silos that cannot deliver consistent access decisions on their own.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
06/06/2026 3:57 am
Identity fabric is best understood as governance infrastructure, not just integration glue. The article’s core point is that multi-cloud IAM fails when policy and access logic are trapped inside separate clouds or applications. Once that happens, the programme is no longer managing one identity plane but several inconsistent ones. Practitioners should read this as a shift in operating model, not a point product conversation.
A question worth separating out:
Q: How should IAM teams use an identity fabric without creating more sprawl?
A: Treat identity fabric as a coordination layer, not another control plane to administer in isolation. The goal is to standardise lifecycle, authentication, authorisation, and audit decisions across systems so that policy intent survives each handoff. If the fabric adds another set of exceptions, it is increasing complexity instead of reducing it.
👉 Read our full editorial: Identity fabric is becoming the control plane for multi-cloud IAM