Topic starter
08/06/2026 4:09 pm
TL;DR: Identity sprawl, siloed IAM systems, and disconnected risk data leave organisations unable to see or control identity-based attack paths across human and machine identities in hybrid, multi-cloud environments, according to Axiad. The real shift is from product thinking to interoperable identity processes, where risk sharing and fabric-style integration become the operational baseline.
Editorial analysis by NHI Mgmt Group, based on content published by Axiad: “The Next Big Thing in Identity Security: Identity Fabrics”.
Key questions
Q: How can teams reduce identity sprawl without losing operational speed?
A: Teams should automate provisioning and revocation, but only within a governance model that also includes periodic review, ownership assignment, and exception handling.
Q: Why do siloed IAM systems make identity risk harder to manage?
A: Siloed IAM systems force each platform to interpret identity in isolation, which makes privilege review, risk scoring, and incident response inconsistent.
Q: What signs show that an identity fabric is not actually working?
A: The clearest sign is that compromise information does not change access decisions outside the originating tool.
Practitioner guidance
- Inventory identity control islands Catalogue every IAM, PKI, cloud identity, XDR, SIEM, and SOAR component that makes access decisions or holds identity risk data, then note where information stops moving between them.
- Test risk data propagation Verify that compromise signals generated in one system can change access decisions in another without manual translation or delayed ticket handling.
- Unify human and machine identity oversight Bring endpoints, workloads, servers, cloud machines, and human users into one identity-risk review model so the same governance language applies across all identity types.
Bottom line: Identity sprawl across hybrid estates turns identity security into a coordination problem as much as a control problem.
Explore further
View Full Forum → | NHI Foundation Course → | Our Services → | Read the full analysis →
This topic was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group
08/06/2026 5:38 pm
Identity fabrics are a governance model, not a product category. The article is right to reject the idea that any single platform can solve hybrid identity security, because the control problem is now distributed across clouds, applications, machines, and teams. What matters is whether identity state, risk, and enforcement can move together across the estate. For practitioners, that means the programme objective is interoperability of decisions, not consolidation of logos.
A question worth separating out:
Q: What should security teams do when IAM governance spans human and machine identities?
A: They should apply the same lifecycle discipline to both populations while preserving identity-specific review logic. That means ownership, offboarding, recertification, and entitlement scope must be defined consistently, even if the workflow steps differ between people and non-human identities.
👉 Read our full editorial: Identity fabrics are the missing layer in hybrid identity security
This post was modified 4 days ago by NHI Mgmt Group