IGA market guide 2025: what IAM teams should re-evaluate

TL;DR: Gartner’s 2025 Market Guide for Identity Governance and Administration frames IGA around automation, AI-driven policy enforcement, and unified governance, while noting Pathlock as a representative vendor. The takeaway is that governance programmes now need to connect access control, compliance, and risk management more tightly than legacy certification cycles allow.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Pathlock: Gartner Market Guide for Identity Governance and Administration

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should IAM teams evaluate modern IGA platforms?

A: IAM teams should evaluate IGA platforms on governance coverage, evidence quality, and how well they handle different identity types.

Q: Why do identity governance programmes struggle as access estates expand?

A: They struggle because governance rules were often designed for slower, more stable identity populations.

Q: How can organisations unify access control and compliance reporting?

A: Organisations can unify them by using one entitlement model, one evidence standard, and one lifecycle process for approvals, reviews, and removals.

Practitioner guidance

• Re-map identity governance by actor type Separate governance requirements for human users, service accounts, API keys, and AI-mediated access so reviews, evidence, and offboarding are not treated as one generic workflow.
• Audit automation for control quality, not just efficiency Check whether automated approval, certification, and revocation steps are based on current entitlement data, current owners, and current exception logic.
• Define one evidence model across governance and compliance Standardise how access decisions, recertifications, and exceptions are recorded so audit output can be reused across IAM, IGA, and risk reporting.

What's in the full report

Pathlock's full report covers the market-detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Gartner's analyst framing of where IGA capability is heading in 2025 and how buyers are evaluating programme maturity.
• The representative-vendor context around Pathlock and how it is positioned inside the market guide.
• The vendor-facing implementation and evaluation detail that supports procurement and roadmap decisions.
• The broader trend discussion on automation and AI-driven policy enforcement in IGA programmes.

👉 Read Pathlock's Gartner Market Guide for Identity Governance and Administration →

IGA market guide 2025: what IAM teams should re-evaluate?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →