IGA solutions in 2026: what identity teams need to fix first

TL;DR: As SaaS sprawl expands identities, permissions, and audit demands, IGA tooling is being asked to centralise provisioning, access reviews, segregation of duties, and reporting across increasingly complex environments, according to Zluri’s overview of 2026 IGA solutions. The real issue is not tool count but whether lifecycle governance can keep pace with privilege drift, offboarding delays, and review fatigue.

NHIMG editorial — based on content published by Zluri: Security & Compliance Top 11 IGA Solutions for Your Organization in 2026

By the numbers:

• Only 20% have formal processes for offboarding and revoking API keys, and even fewer have procedures for rotating them.
• 96% of organisations store secrets outside of secrets managers in vulnerable locations including code, config files, and CI/CD tools.
• 97% of NHIs carry excessive privileges, increasing unauthorised access and broadening the attack surface.

Questions worth separating out

Q: How should organisations manage SaaS access without creating entitlement drift?

A: Organisations should link provisioning, role changes, and offboarding to authoritative lifecycle events and keep app ownership current.

Q: Why do access reviews often fail to reduce identity risk?

A: Access reviews fail when they validate stale roles instead of live entitlements.

Q: What breaks when segregation of duties is not enforced across SaaS apps?

A: SoD breaks when conflicting privileges exist across separate applications or when manual exceptions bypass policy enforcement.

Practitioner guidance

• Inventory SaaS applications by lifecycle owner Create a complete application list with a named business owner, technical owner, and revocation path for each system before expanding IGA workflows.
• Validate access reviews against live entitlements Run certification campaigns using current permissions, not exported role spreadsheets, and require reviewers to see inherited access and SoD conflicts.
• Tie offboarding to authoritative source events Trigger removal of access from HR, contractor, or vendor status changes so revoked identities do not retain standing access in downstream SaaS tools.

What's in the full article

Zluri's full article covers the operational detail this post intentionally leaves for the source:

• Vendor-by-vendor feature descriptions for the 11 IGA platforms in the roundup.
• Product-specific discovery, automation, and access review capabilities that implementation teams would compare.
• Customer rating details and positioning used to distinguish the listed tools.
• The article's full walkthrough of Zluri's own workflows, playbooks, and access certification flow.

👉 Read Zluri's roundup of the top 11 IGA solutions for 2026 →

IGA solutions in 2026: what identity teams need to fix first?

Explore further

View Full Forum →  |  NHI Foundation Course →